These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16812878)

  • 1. Run length, visit duration, and reinforcers per visit in concurrent performance.
    Macdonall J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 May; 69(3):275-93. PubMed ID: 16812878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Some effects of overall rate of earning reinforcers on run lengths and visit durations.
    Macdonall JS
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jul; 73(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16530983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preference pulses without reinforcers.
    McLean AP; Grace RC; Pitts RC; Hughes CE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):317-36. PubMed ID: 24676669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reinforcing staying and switching while using a changeover delay.
    MacDonall JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Mar; 79(2):219-32. PubMed ID: 12822688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How do reinforcers affect choice? Preference pulses after responses and reinforcers.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jul; 108(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 28573713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Delay of reinforcers in a concurrent-chain schedule: An extension of the hyperbolic-decay model.
    Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Sep; 50(2):219-36. PubMed ID: 16812557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responding for sucrose and wheel-running reinforcement: effects of sucrose concentration and wheel-running reinforcer duration.
    Belke TW; Hancock SD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Mar; 79(2):243-65. PubMed ID: 12822690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choice in a variable environment: visit patterns in the dynamics of choice.
    Baum WM; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Jan; 81(1):85-127. PubMed ID: 15113135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Momentary maximizing and optimal foraging theories of performance on concurrent VR schedules.
    MacDonall JS; Goodell J; Juliano A
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):283-99. PubMed ID: 16631321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Earning and obtaining reinforcers under concurrent interval scheduling.
    MacDonall JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Sep; 84(2):167-83. PubMed ID: 16262185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of intertrial reinforcers on rats' timing behavior.
    Wilkie DM; Symons LA; Tees RC
    Behav Processes; 1988 Sep; 17(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 24897549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate.
    Alsop B; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Jan; 49(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 16812530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reinforcer-ratio variation and its effects on rate of adaptation.
    Landon J; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Mar; 75(2):207-34. PubMed ID: 11394487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choice and number of reinforcers.
    Moore J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jul; 32(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 16812143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rats do not respond differently in the presence of stimuli signaling wheel-running reinforcers of different durations.
    Belke TW
    Behav Processes; 2007 May; 75(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 17293061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 10966094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concurrent variable-interval schedule performance: Fixed versus mixed reinforcer durations.
    Davison M; Hogsden I
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Mar; 41(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 16812365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positive behavioral contrast across food and alcohol reinforcers.
    McSweeney FK; Melville CL; Higa J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Nov; 50(3):469-81. PubMed ID: 3209961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.