BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16813014)

  • 1. Removal and transport mechanisms of arsenics in UF and NF membrane processes.
    Kim DH; Kim KW; Cho J
    J Water Health; 2006 Jun; 4(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 16813014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes.
    Yoon J; Amy G; Chung J; Sohn J; Yoon Y
    Chemosphere; 2009 Sep; 77(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 19679331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transport of target anions, chromate (Cr (VI)), arsenate (As (V)), and perchlorate (ClO4-), through RO, NF, and UF membranes.
    Yoon J; Amy G; Yoon Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):327-34. PubMed ID: 16003993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Arsenate removal using a combination treatment of precipitation and nanofiltration.
    Chang FF; Liu WJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):296-302. PubMed ID: 22233908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pharmaceutical rejection by membranes for wastewater reclamation and reuse.
    Park GY; Lee JH; Kim IS; Cho J
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 15344797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coprecipitation of arsenate with iron(III) in aqueous sulfate media: effect of time, lime as base and co-ions on arsenic retention.
    Jia Y; Demopoulos GP
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):661-8. PubMed ID: 17825873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Arsenic recovery from water containing arsenite and arsenate ions by hydrothermal mineralization.
    Itakura T; Sasai R; Itoh H
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jul; 146(1-2):328-33. PubMed ID: 17239530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preparation and performance of arsenate (V) adsorbents derived from concrete wastes.
    Sasaki T; Iizuka A; Watanabe M; Hongo T; Yamasaki A
    Waste Manag; 2014 Oct; 34(10):1829-35. PubMed ID: 24472713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment of dairy wastewater by two-stage membrane operation with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration.
    Gong YW; Zhang HX; Cheng XN
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(5):915-9. PubMed ID: 22339027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel two-step coprecipitation process using Fe(III) and Al(III) for the removal and immobilization of arsenate from acidic aqueous solution.
    Jia Y; Zhang D; Pan R; Xu L; Demopoulos GP
    Water Res; 2012 Feb; 46(2):500-8. PubMed ID: 22142599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds and endocrine disrupting compounds by clean and fouled nanofiltration membranes.
    Yangali-Quintanilla V; Sadmani A; McConville M; Kennedy M; Amy G
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(9):2349-62. PubMed ID: 19303127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Achieving very low mercury levels in refinery wastewater by membrane filtration.
    Urgun-Demirtas M; Benda PL; Gillenwater PS; Negri MC; Xiong H; Snyder SW
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 May; 215-216():98-107. PubMed ID: 22410725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Arsenate removal from simulated groundwater with a Donnan dialyzer.
    Zhao B; Zhao H; Dockko S; Ni J
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 May; 215-216():159-65. PubMed ID: 22436343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recovery of small dye molecules from aqueous solutions using charged ultrafiltration membranes.
    Chen X; Zhao Y; Moutinho J; Shao J; Zydney AL; He Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2015 Mar; 284():58-64. PubMed ID: 25463218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment of landfill leachates by nanofiltration.
    Chaudhari LB; Murthy ZV
    J Environ Manage; 2010 May; 91(5):1209-17. PubMed ID: 20149518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel application of H2O2-Fe(II) process for arsenate removal from synthetic acid mine drainage (AMD) water.
    Dong H; Guan X; Wang D; Li C; Yang X; Dou X
    Chemosphere; 2011 Nov; 85(7):1115-21. PubMed ID: 21840033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of operating parameters on the arsenic removal by nanofiltration.
    Figoli A; Cassano A; Criscuoli A; Mozumder MS; Uddin MT; Islam MA; Drioli E
    Water Res; 2010 Jan; 44(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 19781734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Arsenate removal by zero valent iron: batch and column tests.
    Biterna M; Arditsoglou A; Tsikouras E; Voutsa D
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Nov; 149(3):548-52. PubMed ID: 17689184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Removal of arsenic from water: effect of calcium ions on As(III) removal in the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process.
    Guan X; Ma J; Dong H; Jiang L
    Water Res; 2009 Dec; 43(20):5119-28. PubMed ID: 19201439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Removal of phenolic compounds in water by ultrafiltration membrane treatments.
    Acero JL; Benítez FJ; Leal AI; Real FJ
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2005; 40(8):1585-603. PubMed ID: 15991725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.