These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16813040)
1. Some determinants of changes in preference over time. Hanley GP; Iwata BA; Roscoe EM J Appl Behav Anal; 2006; 39(2):189-202. PubMed ID: 16813040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of preference and reinforcing efficacy of edible, leisure, and social attention stimuli. Butler C; Graff RB J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Apr; 54(2):684-699. PubMed ID: 33469909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of Magnitude on the Displacement of Leisure Items by Edible Items During Preference Assessments. Clark SB; Call NA; Simmons CA; Scheithauer MC; Muething CS; Parks N Behav Modif; 2020 Sep; 44(5):727-745. PubMed ID: 30983381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A review of methods of assessing preference for social stimuli. Morris SL; Gallagher ML; Allen AE J Appl Behav Anal; 2023 Apr; 56(2):416-427. PubMed ID: 36922701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments. DeLeon IG; Fisher WW; Rodriguez-Catter V; Maglieri K; Herman K; Marhefka JM J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):463-73. PubMed ID: 11800185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increasing the efficiency of paired-stimulus preference assessments by identifying categories of preference. Ciccone FJ; Graff RB; Ahearn WH J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 25754896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of establishing operations on preferences for tangible items. McAdam DB; Klatt KP; Koffarnus M; Dicesare A; Solberg K; Welch C; Murphy S J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 15898479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing preferences of individuals with developmental disabilities using alternative stimulus modalities: A systematic review. Heinicke MR; Carr JE; Copsey CJ J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 Jul; 52(3):847-869. PubMed ID: 31045241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the effects of social interaction on the results of preference assessments for leisure items. Kanaman NA; Hubbs AL; Dozier CL; Jones BA; Foley E; Brandt JA J Appl Behav Anal; 2022 Mar; 55(2):430-450. PubMed ID: 34958457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments. DeLeon IG; Iwata BA; Roscoe EM J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 9316260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Roane HS; Vollmer TR; Ringdahl JE; Marcus BA J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):605-20. PubMed ID: 9891397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relative preferences for edible and leisure stimuli in children with autism. Conine DE; Vollmer TR J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 May; 52(2):557-573. PubMed ID: 30468244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Teacher report and direct assessment of preferences for identifying reinforcers for young children. Cote CA; Thompson RH; Hanley GP; McKerchar PM J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 17471799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of preference for edible and leisure items in individuals with dementia. Ortega JV; Iwata BA; Nogales-González C; Frades B J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(4):839-44. PubMed ID: 23322939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relative preferences for edible and leisure stimuli in children with autism: A replication in Italy. Slanzi CM; Graziano M; D'Angelo G; Vollmer TR; Conine DE J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Sep; 53(4):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31835275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]