These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16813774)

  • 41. Electrodiagnostics for low back pain.
    Sandoval AE
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2010 Nov; 21(4):767-76. PubMed ID: 20977959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Lumbar spine stenosis: a common cause of back and leg pain.
    Alvarez JA; Hardy RH
    Am Fam Physician; 1998 Apr; 57(8):1825-34, 1839-40. PubMed ID: 9575322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Clinical examination and electromyographic abnormalities in patients with lower back pain].
    Ortiz-Corredor F
    Rev Neurol; 2003 Jul 16-31; 37(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 12938067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The clinician effect on "objective" technical components of the electrodiagnostic consultation.
    Yamakawa KS; Haig AJ; Geisser ME; Tong HC; Chiodo A; Miner JA
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 May; 86(5):364-72. PubMed ID: 17449981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Spinal stenosis.
    Babb A; Carlson WO
    S D Med; 2006 Mar; 59(3):103-5. PubMed ID: 16566302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The biomechanics of the lumbosacral region in acute and chronic low back pain patients.
    Nakipoğlu GF; Karagöz A; Ozgirgin N
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 18690279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Preliminary results of the use of a two-stage treadmill test as a clinical diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Fritz JM; Erhard RE; Delitto A; Welch WC; Nowakowski PE
    J Spinal Disord; 1997 Oct; 10(5):410-6. PubMed ID: 9355058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The utility of lumbar paraspinal mapping in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Yagci I; Gunduz OH; Ekinci G; Diracoglu D; Us O; Akyuz G
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Oct; 88(10):843-51. PubMed ID: 19661776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Axial loading MRI of the lumbar spine.
    Manenti G; Liccardo G; Sergiacomi G; Ferrante L; D'Andrea G; Konda D; Fraioli B; Schillaci O; Simonetti G; Masala S
    In Vivo; 2003; 17(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 14598603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A physiological approach to the evaluation of lumbosacral spinal stenosis.
    Kraft GH
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 1998 May; 9(2):381-9, viii. PubMed ID: 9894123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Functional movement training for recurrent low back pain: lessons from a pilot randomized controlled trial.
    Schenkman ML; Jordan S; Akuthota V; Roman M; Kohrt WM; Hearty T; Cleary C; Backstrom KM
    PM R; 2009 Feb; 1(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 19627887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Radiology of lumbar spinal canal stenosis].
    Hähnel S; Forsting M; Dörfler A; Sartor K
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Jul; 6(4):165-70. PubMed ID: 8924447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The reliability of determining "leg dominant pain".
    Wai EK; Howse K; Pollock JW; Dornan H; Vexler L; Dagenais S
    Spine J; 2009 Jun; 9(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 19073373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Do cerebral potentials to magnetic stimulation of paraspinal muscles reflect changes in palpable muscle spasm, low back pain, and activity scores?
    Zhu Y; Haldeman S; Hsieh CY; Wu P; Starr A
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Sep; 23(7):458-64. PubMed ID: 11004649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Routine electrodiagnosis and a multiparameter technique in lumbosacral radiculopathies.
    Fisher MA; Bajwa R; Somashekar KN
    Acta Neurol Scand; 2008 Aug; 118(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 18355396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Disc degeneration in low back pain: a 17-year follow-up study using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Waris E; Eskelin M; Hermunen H; Kiviluoto O; Paajanen H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):681-4. PubMed ID: 17413474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The efficacy of prostaglandin E1 derivative in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Matsudaira K; Seichi A; Kunogi J; Yamazaki T; Kobayashi A; Anamizu Y; Kishimoto J; Hoshi K; Takeshita K; Nakamura K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 19112336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical classification of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis based on their leg pain syndrome: its correlation with 2-year surgical outcome.
    Yamashita K; Aono H; Yamasaki R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):980-5. PubMed ID: 17450073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reliability of the assessment of lumbar range of motion and maximal isometric strength in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Roussel NA; Truijen S; De Kerf I; Lambeets D; Nijs J; Stassijns G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):788-91. PubMed ID: 18374015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in the management of chronic low back pain: preliminary report of a randomized, double-blind controlled trial: clinical trial NCT00355914.
    Manchikanti L; Manchikanti KN; Manchukonda R; Cash KA; Damron KS; Pampati V; McManus CD
    Pain Physician; 2007 May; 10(3):425-40. PubMed ID: 17525777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.