126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16813965)
1. Re: no-needle jet anesthetic technique for no-scalpel vasectomy.
Weiss RS
J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):842-3. PubMed ID: 16813965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. No-needle jet anesthetic technique for no-scalpel vasectomy.
Weiss RS; Li PS
J Urol; 2005 May; 173(5):1677-80. PubMed ID: 15821547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative analysis of pain during anesthesia and no-scalpel vasectomy procedure among three different local anesthetic techniques.
Aggarwal H; Chiou RK; Siref LE; Sloan SE
Urology; 2009 Jul; 74(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 19428086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative analysis of effectiveness of two local anesthetic techniques in men undergoing no-scalpel vasectomy.
White MA; Maatman TJ
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1187-9. PubMed ID: 18158044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Re: No-needle jet anesthetic technique for no-scalpel vasectomy.
Wilson CL
J Urol; 2005 Oct; 174(4 Pt 1):1504-5; author reply 1505. PubMed ID: 16145497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Re: White M, Maatman T. Comparative analysis of effectiveness of two local anesthetic techniques in men undergoing no-scalpel vasectomy. (Urology 2007;70:1187-1189).
Weiss RS
Urology; 2008 Aug; 72(2):462. PubMed ID: 18579188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. No-needle anesthetic for no-scalpel vasectomy.
Wilson CL
Am Fam Physician; 2001 Apr; 63(7):1295. PubMed ID: 11310646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Topical anesthesia with EMLA does not decrease pain during vasectomy.
Thomas AA; Nguyen CT; Dhar NB; Sabanegh ES; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):271-3. PubMed ID: 18499175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. No-scalpel, no-needle vasectomy.
Monoski MA; Li PS; Baum N; Goldstein M
Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 16806411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Simply modified no-scalpel vasectomy (percutaneous vasectomy)--a comparative study against the standard no-scalpel vasectomy.
Chen KC; Peng CC; Hsieh HM; Chiang HS
Contraception; 2005 Feb; 71(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 15707567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [No-scalpel vasectomy].
Viladoms Fuster JM; Shihua Li P
Arch Esp Urol; 1994 Sep; 47(7):695-701. PubMed ID: 7802473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vasectomy techniques.
Clenney TL; Higgins JC
Am Fam Physician; 1999 Jul; 60(1):137-46, 151-2. PubMed ID: 10414634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. FPIN's clinical inquiries. Advantages of the no-scalpel vasectomy technique.
Moss DA; Russell TC; Moss JB; Stephens MB; Rollins A
Am Fam Physician; 2012 Jun; 85(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 22962904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. No scalpel vasectomy--an overview.
Kaza RC
J Indian Med Assoc; 2006 Mar; 104(3):129-30, 132-3, 141. PubMed ID: 16910335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. No-scalpel technique for vasectomy.
Filshie M
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 1996 Sep; 1(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 9678121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Re "No-scalpel vasectomy outside China".
Waites GM
Asian J Androl; 2000 Mar; 2(1):78. PubMed ID: 11228942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Office based vasectomy can be performed by supervised urological residents with patient pain and morbidity comparable to those of a staff surgeon procedure.
Nguyen CT; Hernandez AV; Gao T; Thomas AA; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1451-4. PubMed ID: 18710737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Re: a comparative study of the no scalpel and standard incision approachesto vasectomy in 5 countries.
Morrison GE; Alderman PM
J Urol; 2000 Jun; 163(6):1892-3. PubMed ID: 10799220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel modification of no-scalpel vasectomy: a preliminary report.
Akhavizadegan H; Karbakhsh M
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2009 Oct; 14(5):371-4. PubMed ID: 19916764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Best vasectomy technique?
Labrecque M
J Fam Pract; 2000 Feb; 49(2):175, 177. PubMed ID: 10718697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
