These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Wavefront-guided retreatment after primary wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in myopes and hyperopes: long-term follow-up. Kashani S; Rajan M; Gartry D Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 147(3):417-423.e2. PubMed ID: 19054497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of two pupillometers in determining pupil size for refractive surgery. Bootsma S; Tahzib N; Eggink F; de Brabander J; Nuijts R Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 17488463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of the Colvard, Procyon, and Neuroptics pupillometers for measuring pupil diameter under low ambient illumination. Schallenberg M; Bangre V; Steuhl KP; Kremmer S; Selbach JM J Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 26(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 20163078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Visual outcomes after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis with and without iris registration. Tantayakom T; Lim JN; Purcell TL; Nalgirkar A; Cheng L; Schanzlin DJ J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1532-7. PubMed ID: 18721715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Laser in situ keratomileusis disrupts the aberration compensation mechanism of the human eye. Benito A; Redondo M; Artal P Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 147(3):424-431.e1. PubMed ID: 19058779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Safety and efficacy of PRK and LASIK in pediatric patients. Qian Y; Pineda R Int Ophthalmol Clin; 2008; 48(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 18427270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Correlation of infrared pupillometers and CCD camera imaging from aberrometry and videokeratography for determining scotopic pupil size. Cheng AC; Rao SK; Lam DS J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Feb; 32(2):183-4; author reply 184. PubMed ID: 16564963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Measurement of pupil centroid shift and cyclotorsional displacement using iris registration. Park SH; Kim M; Joo CK Ophthalmologica; 2009; 223(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 19158447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Aberrations and Pupil location under corneal topography and Hartmann-Shack illumination conditions. Tabernero J; Atchison DA; Markwell EL Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 50(4):1964-70. PubMed ID: 19060267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Technical note: Comparison of the wavefront aberrations between natural and pharmacological pupil dilations. Yang Y; Wu F Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Mar; 27(2):220-3. PubMed ID: 17324214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Laser in situ keratomileusis for astigmatism following laser thermal keratoplasty. Thompson MJ; Brightbill FS J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jan; 33(1):142-3. PubMed ID: 17189811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Standardization is required to evaluate optical quality after LASIK. Brown SM; Khanani AM J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Feb; 31(2):258. PubMed ID: 15767128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors in a hyperopic shift after LASIK. Patel S; AliĆ³ JL Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar; 109(3):407-9. PubMed ID: 11874729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]