603 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16814370)
1. Participation of the general gynecologist in surgical staging of endometrial cancer: analysis of cost and perioperative outcomes.
Hoekstra A; Singh DK; Garb M; Arekapudi S; Rademaker A; Lurain JR
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):897-901. PubMed ID: 16814370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost analysis of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for early endometrial cancer.
Scribner DR; Mannel RS; Walker JL; Johnson GA
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Dec; 75(3):460-3. PubMed ID: 10600307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: analysis of the first 100 cases.
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 11520146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The benefits of a gynecologic oncologist: a pattern of care study for endometrial cancer treatment.
Roland PY; Kelly FJ; Kulwicki CY; Blitzer P; Curcio M; Orr JW
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Apr; 93(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 15047225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of surgeon specialty on processes of care and outcomes for ovarian cancer patients.
Earle CC; Schrag D; Neville BA; Yabroff KR; Topor M; Fahey A; Trimble EL; Bodurka DC; Bristow RE; Carney M; Warren JL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Feb; 98(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 16449677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?
Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki MI; Moody JM; Garafano LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):329-35. PubMed ID: 10985889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: clinical outcomes and hospital charges.
Gemignani ML; Curtin JP; Zelmanovich J; Patel DA; Venkatraman E; Barakat RR
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Apr; 73(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 10094872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Economic considerations for aortic surgery: retroperitoneal approach--is it worth it?
Buckley CJ; Lee SD; Arko FR; Bohannon WT; Mettauer M; Patterson DE; Manning LG
Acta Chir Belg; 2000; 100(6):247-50. PubMed ID: 11236176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy.
Holtz DO; Miroshnichenko G; Finnegan MO; Chernick M; Dunton CJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 20547112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of age on clinical/pathologic features, surgical morbidity, and outcome in patients with endometrial cancer.
Lachance JA; Everett EN; Greer B; Mandel L; Swisher E; Tamimi H; Goff B
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jun; 101(3):470-5. PubMed ID: 16413048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma.
Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Zhang B; Sikes C; Kimball KJ; Kilgore LC; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Alvarez RD
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):604-7. PubMed ID: 21658752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection in the obese.
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin DS; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Mar; 84(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 11855882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Wong CK; Wong YH; Lo LS; Tai CM; Ng TK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Aug; 31(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 16018773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-surgeon versus single-surgeon radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: impact on patient outcomes and costs.
Ludwig AT; Inampudi L; O'Donnell MA; Kreder KJ; Williams RD; Konety BR
Urology; 2005 Mar; 65(3):488-92. PubMed ID: 15780361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes from 3144 adrenalectomies in the United States: which matters more, surgeon volume or specialty?
Park HS; Roman SA; Sosa JA
Arch Surg; 2009 Nov; 144(11):1060-7. PubMed ID: 19917944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
