These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16815781)

  • 1. Agreement between polar and SRM mobile ergometer systems during laboratory-based high-intensity, intermittent cycling activity.
    Hurst HT; Atkins S
    J Sports Sci; 2006 Aug; 24(8):863-8. PubMed ID: 16815781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Further mechanical considerations between polar and SRM mobile ergometer systems during laboratory-based high-intensity, intermittent cycling activity.
    Gordon RS; Franklin KL; Davies B; Baker JS
    Res Sports Med; 2007; 15(4):241-7. PubMed ID: 18158689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity and reliability of the Polar S710 mobile cycling powermeter.
    Millet GP; Tronche C; Fuster N; Bentley DJ; Candau R
    Int J Sports Med; 2003 Apr; 24(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 12740731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The validity of power output recorded during exercise performance tests using a Kingcycle air-braked cycle ergometer when compared with an SRM powermeter.
    Balmer J; Davison RC; Coleman DA; Bird SR
    Int J Sports Med; 2000 Apr; 21(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 10834352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Power output of field-based downhill mountain biking.
    Hurst HT; Atkins S
    J Sports Sci; 2006 Oct; 24(10):1047-53. PubMed ID: 17115519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ergometer error and biological variation in power output in a performance test with three cycle ergometers.
    Paton CD; Hopkins WG
    Int J Sports Med; 2006 Jun; 27(6):444-7. PubMed ID: 16767608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and reliability of the Wattbike cycle ergometer.
    Hopker J; Myers S; Jobson SA; Bruce W; Passfield L
    Int J Sports Med; 2010 Oct; 31(10):731-6. PubMed ID: 20665423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanically braked Wingate powers: agreement between SRM, corrected and conventional methods of measurement.
    Balmer J; Bird S; Davison RC; Doherty M; Smith P
    J Sports Sci; 2004 Jul; 22(7):661-7. PubMed ID: 15370497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity and reliability of the Ergomopro powermeter.
    Kirkland A; Coleman D; Wiles JD; Hopker J
    Int J Sports Med; 2008 Nov; 29(11):913-6. PubMed ID: 18512176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity and reliability of the PowerTap mobile cycling powermeter when compared with the SRM Device.
    Bertucci W; Duc S; Villerius V; Pernin JN; Grappe F
    Int J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 26(10):868-73. PubMed ID: 16320172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of differing pedalling speeds on the power-duration relationship of high intensity cycle ergometry.
    McNaughton L; Thomas D
    Int J Sports Med; 1996 May; 17(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 8814511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of a combined 3-min constant load and performance cycling test.
    Doherty M; Balmer J; Davison RC; Robinson L; Smith PM
    Int J Sports Med; 2003 Jul; 24(5):366-71. PubMed ID: 12868049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Indoor 16.1-km time-trial performance in cyclists aged 25- 63 years.
    Balmer J; Bird S; Davison R
    J Sports Sci; 2008 Jan; 26(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17852672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of age on 16.1-km time-trial performance.
    Balmer J; Bird S; Davison R; Lucia A
    J Sports Sci; 2008 Jan; 26(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 17924277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of mean power recorded during indoor and outdoor self-paced 40 km cycling time-trials.
    Smith MF; Davison RC; Balmer J; Bird SR
    Int J Sports Med; 2001 May; 22(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 11414669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Power output and metabolic cost of synchronous and asynchronous submaximal and peak level hand cycling on a motor driven treadmill in able-bodied male subjects.
    van der Woude LH; Horstman A; Faas P; Mechielsen S; Bafghi HA; de Koning JJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Jun; 30(5):574-80. PubMed ID: 17709272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Polar 810s and an ambulatory ECG system for RR interval measurement during progressive exercise.
    Kingsley M; Lewis MJ; Marson RE
    Int J Sports Med; 2005; 26(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 15643533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of power output during ergometer and track cycling in adolescent cyclists.
    Nimmerichter A; Williams CA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Apr; 29(4):1049-56. PubMed ID: 25353075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity and reliability of the Axiom PowerTrain cycle ergometer when compared with an SRM powermeter.
    Bertucci W; Duc S; Villerius V; Grappe F
    Int J Sports Med; 2005; 26(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 15643536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of the Velotron ergometer and SRM power meter.
    Abbiss CR; Quod MJ; Levin G; Martin DT; Laursen PB
    Int J Sports Med; 2009 Feb; 30(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 19177315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.