These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16815797)
1. Psychophysics of sweet and fat perception in obesity: problems, solutions and new perspectives. Bartoshuk LM; Duffy VB; Hayes JE; Moskowitz HR; Snyder DJ Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2006 Jul; 361(1471):1137-48. PubMed ID: 16815797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Habituation to the pleasure elicited by sweetness in lean and obese women. Pepino MY; Mennella JA Appetite; 2012 Jun; 58(3):800-5. PubMed ID: 22326885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sweet/Fat Preference Taste in Subjects Who are Lean, Obese and Very Obese. Leohr J; Kjellsson MC Pharm Res; 2020 Nov; 37(12):244. PubMed ID: 33215233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Taste preferences and body weight changes in an obesity-prone population. Salbe AD; DelParigi A; Pratley RE; Drewnowski A; Tataranni PA Am J Clin Nutr; 2004 Mar; 79(3):372-8. PubMed ID: 14985209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the hedonic general Labeled Magnitude Scale with the hedonic 9-point scale. Kalva JJ; Sims CA; Puentes LA; Snyder DJ; Bartoshuk LM J Food Sci; 2014 Feb; 79(2):S238-45. PubMed ID: 24422940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching. Bartoshuk LM; Duffy VB; Green BG; Hoffman HJ; Ko CW; Lucchina LA; Marks LE; Snyder DJ; Weiffenbach JM Physiol Behav; 2004 Aug; 82(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 15234598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Associations between weight status and liking scores for sweet, salt and fat according to the gender in adults (The Nutrinet-Santé study). Deglaire A; Méjean C; Castetbon K; Kesse-Guyot E; Hercberg S; Schlich P Eur J Clin Nutr; 2015 Jan; 69(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 25074389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sweet and fat taste preference in obesity have different associations with personality and eating behavior. Elfhag K; Erlanson-Albertsson C Physiol Behav; 2006 Jun; 88(1-2):61-6. PubMed ID: 16624348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cream and sugar: human preferences for high-fat foods. Drewnowski A; Greenwood MR Physiol Behav; 1983 Apr; 30(4):629-33. PubMed ID: 6878464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking. Hayes JE; Duffy VB Physiol Behav; 2008 Sep; 95(1-2):77-87. PubMed ID: 18538361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The controls of fat intake. Greenberg D; Smith GP Psychosom Med; 1996; 58(6):559-69. PubMed ID: 8948004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Participants with pharmacologically impaired taste function seek out more intense, higher calorie stimuli. Noel CA; Sugrue M; Dando R Appetite; 2017 Oct; 117():74-81. PubMed ID: 28606563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revisiting sugar-fat mixtures: sweetness and creaminess vary with phenotypic markers of oral sensation. Hayes JE; Duffy VB Chem Senses; 2007 Mar; 32(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 17204520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dietary taste patterns by sex and weight status in the Netherlands. van Langeveld AWB; Teo PS; de Vries JHM; Feskens EJM; de Graaf C; Mars M Br J Nutr; 2018 May; 119(10):1195-1206. PubMed ID: 29759103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Taste hedonics and thresholds in obesity. Malcolm R; O'Neil PM; Hirsch AA; Currey HS; Moskowitz G Int J Obes; 1980; 4(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 7419338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Taste preferences in association with dietary habits and weight status in European children: results from the IDEFICS study. Lanfer A; Knof K; Barba G; Veidebaum T; Papoutsou S; de Henauw S; Soós T; Moreno LA; Ahrens W; Lissner L Int J Obes (Lond); 2012 Jan; 36(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 21844876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]