These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16816090)

  • 1. A Cartesian reflex assessment of face processing.
    Polewan RJ; Vigorito CM; Nason CD; Block RA; Moore JW
    Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev; 2006 Mar; 5(1):3-23. PubMed ID: 16816090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conditioned facilitation of the unconditioned reflex after classical eyeblink conditioning.
    Asli O; Flaten MA
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Jan; 67(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 17976844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Event-related potential correlates of repetition priming for ignored faces.
    Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR; Wiese H; Burton AM
    Neuroreport; 2007 Aug; 18(13):1305-9. PubMed ID: 17762702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual organization and visual attention.
    Kimchi R
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():15-33. PubMed ID: 19733747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual mismatch negativity elicited by facial expressions under non-attentional condition.
    Zhao L; Li J
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Dec; 410(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 17081690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. N250r ERP repetition effects from distractor faces when attending to another face under load: Evidence for a face attention resource.
    Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2009 May; 1270():64-77. PubMed ID: 19306855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emotional conditioning to masked stimuli and modulation of visuospatial attention.
    Beaver JD; Mogg K; Bradley BP
    Emotion; 2005 Mar; 5(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 15755220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contingent capture of visual-spatial attention depends on capacity-limited central mechanisms: evidence from human electrophysiology and the psychological refractory period.
    Brisson B; Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Feb; 80(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19000734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facilitation of visual processing by masked presentation of a conditioned facial stimulus.
    Lee TH; Lim SL; Lee KY; Choi JS
    Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(8):750-4. PubMed ID: 19398934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of aging and exposure duration on perceptual biases in chimeric face processing.
    Butler SH; Harvey M
    Cortex; 2008 Jun; 44(6):665-72. PubMed ID: 18472036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What antipriming reveals about priming.
    Marsolek CJ
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 May; 12(5):176-81. PubMed ID: 18403251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage?
    Johnston JC; McCann RS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):694-719. PubMed ID: 16707358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary visual cortex reflects behavioral performance in the attentional blink.
    Stein T; Vallines I; Schneider WX
    Neuroreport; 2008 Aug; 19(13):1277-81. PubMed ID: 18695507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional capture by emotional stimuli is modulated by semantic processing.
    Huang YM; Baddeley A; Young AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):328-39. PubMed ID: 18377174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink.
    Olivers CN; Nieuwenhuis S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):364-79. PubMed ID: 16634676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A spatial frequency account of the detriment that local processing of Navon letters has on face recognition.
    Hills PJ; Lewis MB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1427-42. PubMed ID: 19803647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention modulates initial stages of visual word processing.
    Ruz M; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 20(9):1727-36. PubMed ID: 18345981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low spatial frequency filtering modulates early brain processing of affective complex pictures.
    Alorda C; Serrano-Pedraza I; Campos-Bueno JJ; Sierra-Vázquez V; Montoya P
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Nov; 45(14):3223-33. PubMed ID: 17681356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.