147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16817148)
1. A practical approach to computing power for generalized linear models with nominal, count, or ordinal responses.
Lyles RH; Lin HM; Williamson JM
Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(7):1632-48. PubMed ID: 16817148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes.
Walters SJ; Campbell MJ
Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):1075-102. PubMed ID: 15570625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimates, power and sample size calculations for two-sample ordinal outcomes under before-after study designs.
Strickland PA; Lu SE
Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(11):1807-18. PubMed ID: 12754716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to ordinal scaled data as arising in randomized controlled trials.
Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1317-34. PubMed ID: 12687657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A note on non-parametric ANCOVA for covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials.
Lesaffre E; Senn S
Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(23):3583-96. PubMed ID: 14652862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Goodness-of-fit methods for generalized linear mixed models.
Pan Z; Lin DY
Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):1000-9. PubMed ID: 16401273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A simple approach to power and sample size calculations in logistic regression and Cox regression models.
Vaeth M; Skovlund E
Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1781-92. PubMed ID: 15160408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sample-size calculations for studies with correlated ordinal outcomes.
Kim HY; Williamson JM; Lyles CM
Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(19):2977-87. PubMed ID: 16149125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accurate and efficient power calculations for 2 x m tables in unmatched case-control designs.
Bukszár J; van den Oord EJ
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2632-46. PubMed ID: 16025555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A general approach for sample size and statistical power calculations assessing of interventions using a mixture model in the presence of detection limits.
Nie L; Chu H; Cole SR
Contemp Clin Trials; 2006 Oct; 27(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 16769254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of recent methods for the analysis of small-sample cross-over studies.
Chen X; Wei L
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2821-33. PubMed ID: 12953282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pseudo-likelihood methods for longitudinal binary data with non-ignorable missing responses and covariates.
Parzen M; Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM; Ibrahim JG; Troxel A
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2784-96. PubMed ID: 16345018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Operating characteristics of sample size re-estimation with futility stopping based on conditional power.
Lachin JM
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3348-65. PubMed ID: 16345019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Odds ratios for a continuous outcome variable without dichotomizing.
Moser BK; Coombs LP
Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(12):1843-60. PubMed ID: 15195319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Goodness-of-fit tests for GEE modeling with binary responses.
Barnhart HX; Williamson JM
Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):720-9. PubMed ID: 9629652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methods for confidence interval estimation of a ratio parameter with application to location quotients.
Beyene J; Moineddin R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():32. PubMed ID: 16221306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment on homogeneity tests for kappa statistics under equal prevalence across studies in reliability.
Nam JM
Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1521-31. PubMed ID: 16220477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An alternative parameterization of the general linear mixture model for longitudinal data with non-ignorable drop-outs.
Fitzmaurice GM; Laird NM; Shneyer L
Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(7):1009-21. PubMed ID: 11276032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Goodness-of-fit tests for ordinal response regression models.
Pulkstenis E; Robinson TJ
Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):999-1014. PubMed ID: 15027085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparisons of two-part models with competitors.
Lachenbruch PA
Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(8):1215-34. PubMed ID: 11304737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
