140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1681913)
1. Influence of drape permeability on wound contamination during mastectomy.
Werner HP; Hoborn J; Schön K; Petri E
Eur J Surg; 1991; 157(6-7):379-83. PubMed ID: 1681913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Source and route of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis transmitted to the surgical wound during cardio-thoracic surgery. Possibility of preventing wound contamination by use of special scrub suits.
Tammelin A; Hambraeus A; Ståhle E
J Hosp Infect; 2001 Apr; 47(4):266-76. PubMed ID: 11289769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of a plastic wound drape on contamination with enterobacteria and on infection after appendicectomy.
Nyström PO; Bröte L
Acta Chir Scand; 1980; 146(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 6990669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Routes and sources of Staphylococcus aureus transmitted to the surgical wound during cardiothoracic surgery: possibility of preventing wound contamination by use of special scrub suits.
Tammelin A; Hambraeus A; Ståhle E
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2001 Jun; 22(6):338-46. PubMed ID: 11519910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The efficacy of adhesive plastic incise drapes in preventing wound contamination.
Ha'eri GB
Int Surg; 1983; 68(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 6853079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Effect of surgical draping on bacterial contamination in the surgical field].
Katthagen BD; Zamani P; Jung W
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1992; 130(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 1642040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wound infections in clean and potentially contaminated surgery. Importance of bacterial and non-bacterial factors.
Bröte L
Acta Chir Scand; 1976; 142(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 936946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Disinfection by antiseptics in management of postoperative surgical wounds in urologic operations.
Takahashi S; Takeyama K; Hashimoto K; Kurimura Y; Hirobe M; Takei F; Furuya R; Shimizu T; Kunishima Y; Hotta H; Matsukawa M; Hirose T; Tsukamoto T
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2006 Feb; 52(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 16541760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The conventionally ventilated operating theatre and air contamination control during cardiac surgery--bacteriological and particulate matter control garment options for low level contamination.
Verkkala K; Eklund A; Ojajärvi J; Tiittanen L; Hoborn J; Mäkelä P
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 Aug; 14(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 9755009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bacterial recolonization of the skin and wound contamination during cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial of the use of plastic adhesive drape compared with bare skin.
Falk-Brynhildsen K; Söderquist B; Friberg O; Nilsson UG
J Hosp Infect; 2013 Jun; 84(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 23623487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relative importance of the routes and sources of wound contamination during general surgery. II. Airborne.
Whyte W; Hambraeus A; Laurell G; Hoborn J
J Hosp Infect; 1992 Sep; 22(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 1358946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Further bacteriological evaluation of the TOUL mobile system delivering ultra-clean air over surgical patients and instruments.
Thore M; Burman LG
J Hosp Infect; 2006 Jun; 63(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 16621144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical area contamination--comparable bacterial counts using disposable head and mask and helmet aspirator system, but dramatic increase upon omission of head-gear: an experimental study in horizontal laminar air-flow.
Friberg B; Friberg S; Ostensson R; Burman LG
J Hosp Infect; 2001 Feb; 47(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 11170774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incise Draping Reduces the Rate of Contamination of the Surgical Site During Hip Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Trial.
Rezapoor M; Tan TL; Maltenfort MG; Parvizi J
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1891-1895. PubMed ID: 29525345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigations of the bacteriological factors in clean neurosurgical wounds.
Savitz SI; Bottone EJ; Savitz MH; Malis LI
Neurosurgery; 1994 Mar; 34(3):417-20; discussion 420-1. PubMed ID: 8190215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of a one-step iodophor skin preparation versus traditional preparation in total joint surgery.
Gilliam DL; Nelson CL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Jan; (250):258-60. PubMed ID: 2293938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Preoperative skin disinfection in interventions on the hip joint].
Staudte HW; Hövener B; Müller WD
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1988; 126(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 3289276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Air contamination for predicting wound contamination in clean surgery: A large multicenter study.
Birgand G; Toupet G; Rukly S; Antoniotti G; Deschamps MN; Lepelletier D; Pornet C; Stern JB; Vandamme YM; van der Mee-Marquet N; Timsit JF; Lucet JC
Am J Infect Control; 2015 May; 43(5):516-21. PubMed ID: 25752955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wound contamination in cardiac surgery. A systematic quantitative and qualitative study of the bacterial growth in sternal wounds in cardiac surgery patients.
Kühme T; Isaksson B; Dahlin LG
APMIS; 2007 Sep; 115(9):1001-7. PubMed ID: 17931237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The evaluation of skin disinfection efficacy and its influence on prevalence of surgical site infections in patients subjected to laparoscopic cholecystectomy].
Bieńkowski M; Gospodarek E; Olejarz A; Deptuła A
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2007; 59(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 17929416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
