These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16819650)

  • 1. Coexistence in the chemostat as a result of metabolic by-products.
    Hesseler J; Schmidt JK; Reichl U; Flockerzi D
    J Math Biol; 2006 Oct; 53(4):556-84. PubMed ID: 16819650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of a three bacteria mixed culture in a chemostat: evaluation and application of a quantitative terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis for absolute and species specific cell enumeration.
    Schmidt JK; König B; Reichl U
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Mar; 96(4):738-56. PubMed ID: 16937400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel concept combining experimental and mathematical analysis for the identification of unknown interspecies effects in a mixed culture.
    Schmidt JK; Riedele C; Regestein L; Rausenberger J; Reichl U
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2011 Aug; 108(8):1900-11. PubMed ID: 21391206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Competition in chemostat-type equations with two habitats.
    Nakaoka S; Takeuchi Y
    Math Biosci; 2006 May; 201(1-2):157-71. PubMed ID: 16448673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Competition in the presence of a lethal external inhibitor.
    Hsu SB; Li YS; Waltman P
    Math Biosci; 2000 Oct; 167(2):177-99. PubMed ID: 10998488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coexistence phenomena and global bifurcation structure in a chemostat-like model with species-dependent diffusion rates.
    Castella F; Madec S
    J Math Biol; 2014 Jan; 68(1-2):377-415. PubMed ID: 23263380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interspecies effects in a ceftazidime-treated mixed culture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia cepacia and Staphylococcus aureus: analysis at the single-species level.
    Riedele C; Reichl U
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2011 Jan; 66(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 21062793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Competition and allelopathy with resource storage: two resources.
    Grover JP; Wang FB
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Jun; 351():9-24. PubMed ID: 24560723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consequences of symbiosis for food web dynamics.
    Kooi BW; Kuijper LD; Kooijman SA
    J Math Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(3):227-71. PubMed ID: 15293013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Competition in the chemostat: A stochastic multi-species model and its asymptotic behavior.
    Xu C; Yuan S
    Math Biosci; 2016 Oct; 280():1-9. PubMed ID: 27474206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Competition between microorganisms for a single limiting resource with cell quota structure and spatial variation.
    Grover JP; Hsu SB; Wang FB
    J Math Biol; 2012 Apr; 64(5):713-43. PubMed ID: 21603941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A competition model with dynamically allocated inhibitor production.
    Braselton JP; Waltman P
    Math Biosci; 2001 Oct; 173(2):55-84. PubMed ID: 11585601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association between competition and obligate mutualism in a chemostat.
    El Hajji M; Harmand J; Chaker H; Lobry C
    J Biol Dyn; 2009 Nov; 3(6):635-47. PubMed ID: 22880965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploitative competition in the chemostat for two perfectly substitutable resources.
    Ballyk MM; Wolkowicz GS
    Math Biosci; 1993 Dec; 118(2):127-80. PubMed ID: 8305826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Plasmid-bearing, plasmid-free organisms competing for two complementary nutrients in a chemostat.
    Hsu SB; Tzeng YH
    Math Biosci; 2002; 179(2):183-206. PubMed ID: 12208615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coexistence of three microbial populations competing for three complementary nutrients in a chemostat.
    Vayenas DV; Pavlou S
    Math Biosci; 1999 Oct; 161(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 10546438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Population dynamics and competition in chemostat models with adaptive nutrient uptake.
    Tang B; Sitomer A; Jackson T
    J Math Biol; 1997 Mar; 35(4):453-79. PubMed ID: 9104013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Possible occurrence of a Crabtree effect in the production of lactic and butyric acids by a floc-forming bacterial consortium.
    Thierie J; Penninckx MJ
    Curr Microbiol; 2004 Mar; 48(3):224-9. PubMed ID: 15057470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mutual inhibition in presence of a virus in continuous culture.
    Alsahafi S; Woodcock S
    Math Biosci Eng; 2021 Apr; 18(4):3258-3273. PubMed ID: 34198384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Delayed feedback control for a chemostat model.
    Tagashira O; Hara T
    Math Biosci; 2006 May; 201(1-2):101-12. PubMed ID: 16472826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.