181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16819688)
1. Prediction of torsional failure in 22 cadaver femora with and without simulated subtrochanteric metastatic defects: a CT scan-based finite element analysis.
Spruijt S; van der Linden JC; Dijkstra PD; Wiggers T; Oudkerk M; Snijders CJ; van Keulen F; Verhaar JA; Weinans H; Swierstra BA
Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):474-81. PubMed ID: 16819688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The assessment of the risk of fracture in femora with metastatic lesions: comparing case-specific finite element analyses with predictions by clinical experts.
Derikx LC; van Aken JB; Janssen D; Snyers A; van der Linden YM; Verdonschot N; Tanck E
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Aug; 94(8):1135-42. PubMed ID: 22844058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of the pathological fracture risk during stance and fall-loading configurations for metastases in the proximal femur, using a computed tomography-based finite element method.
Shinoda Y; Kobayashi H; Kaneko M; Ohashi S; Bessho M; Hayashi N; Oka H; Imanishi J; Sawada R; Ogura K; Tanaka S; Haga N; Kawano H
J Orthop Sci; 2019 Nov; 24(6):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 31521453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. QCT-based finite element prediction of pathologic fractures in proximal femora with metastatic lesions.
Benca E; Synek A; Amini M; Kainberger F; Hirtler L; Windhager R; Mayr W; Pahr DH
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10305. PubMed ID: 31311994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Femoral recon nails for metastatic disease: indications, technique, and results.
Ward WG; Spang J; Howe D; Gordan S
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2000 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):34-42. PubMed ID: 11011778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Density predicts the activity-dependent failure load of proximal femora with defects.
Michaeli DA; Inoue K; Hayes WC; Hipp JA
Skeletal Radiol; 1999 Feb; 28(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 10197454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting failure load of the femur with simulated osteolytic defects using noninvasive imaging technique in a simplified load case.
Lee T
Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Apr; 35(4):642-50. PubMed ID: 17286207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting pathological fracture in femoral metastases using a clinical CT scan based algorithm: A case-control study.
Janssen SJ; Paulino Pereira NR; Meijs TA; Bredella MA; Ferrone ML; van Dijk CN; Bramer JAM; Lozano-Calderón SA; Schwab JH
J Orthop Sci; 2018 Mar; 23(2):394-402. PubMed ID: 29128112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When and where do patients with bone metastases actually break their femurs?
Sternheim A; Traub F; Trabelsi N; Dadia S; Gortzak Y; Snir N; Gorfine M; Yosibash Z
Bone Joint J; 2020 May; 102-B(5):638-645. PubMed ID: 32349590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT-based Structural Rigidity Analysis Is More Accurate Than Mirels Scoring for Fracture Prediction in Metastatic Femoral Lesions.
Damron TA; Nazarian A; Entezari V; Brown C; Grant W; Calderon N; Zurakowski D; Terek RM; Anderson ME; Cheng EY; Aboulafia AJ; Gebhardt MC; Snyder BD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Mar; 474(3):643-51. PubMed ID: 26169800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical model of a high risk impending pathologic fracture of the femur: lesion creation based on clinically implemented scoring systems.
Alexander GE; Gutierrez S; Nayak A; Palumbo BT; Cheong D; Letson GD; Santoni BG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Apr; 28(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 23597777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of finite element analysis for prediction of the strength reduction due to metastatic lesions in the femoral neck.
Cheal EJ; Hipp JA; Hayes WC
J Biomech; 1993 Mar; 26(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 8468338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of a percutaneous technique for repairing proximal femora with simulated metastatic lesions.
Kaneko TS; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jun; 29(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 16949854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cortical bone finite element models in the estimation of experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur.
Koivumäki JE; Thevenot J; Pulkkinen P; Kuhn V; Link TM; Eckstein F; Jämsä T
Bone; 2012 Oct; 51(4):737-40. PubMed ID: 22796418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility of percutaneous cementoplasty combined with interventional internal fixation for impending pathologic fracture of the proximal femur.
He C; Tian Q; Wu CG; Gu Y; Wang T; Li M
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Jul; 25(7):1112-7. PubMed ID: 24801501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image-based anatomical reconstruction and pharmaco-mediated bone remodeling model applied to a femur with subtrochanteric fracture: A subject-specific finite element study.
Bahia MT; Hecke MB; Mercuri EGF
Med Eng Phys; 2019 Jul; 69():58-71. PubMed ID: 31171487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling.
Keyak JH; Rossi SA; Jones KA; Skinner HB
J Biomech; 1998 Feb; 31(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 9593205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ct-based finite element models can be used to estimate experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur.
Koivumäki JE; Thevenot J; Pulkkinen P; Kuhn V; Link TM; Eckstein F; Jämsä T
Bone; 2012 Apr; 50(4):824-9. PubMed ID: 22306697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?
Schileo E; Balistreri L; Grassi L; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3531-8. PubMed ID: 25261321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load.
Keyak JH; Falkinstein Y
Med Eng Phys; 2003 Nov; 25(9):781-7. PubMed ID: 14519351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
