181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16819688)
21. Subtrochanteric pathological fracture of both femora secondary to malignant pheochromocytoma. A case report.
Glassman AH; Kean JR; Martino JD; Mentser MI
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1990 Dec; 72(10):1554-8. PubMed ID: 2254367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Not All Patients Undergoing Stabilization of Impending Pathologic Fractures for Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastases to the Femur Need Preoperative Embolization.
Jernigan EW; Tennant JN; Esther RJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Mar; 476(3):529-534. PubMed ID: 29529636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Modification to Mirels scoring system location component improves fracture prediction for metastatic disease of the proximal femur.
Amendola RL; Miller MA; Kaupp SM; Cleary RJ; Damron TA; Mann KA
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Jan; 24(1):65. PubMed ID: 36694156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pressurization of the metastatic femur during prophylactic intramedullary nail fixation.
Roth SE; Rebello MM; Kreder H; Whyne CM
J Trauma; 2004 Aug; 57(2):333-9. PubMed ID: 15345982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Simulating activities of daily living with finite element analysis improves fracture prediction for patients with metastatic femoral lesions.
Goodheart JR; Cleary RJ; Damron TA; Mann KA
J Orthop Res; 2015 Aug; 33(8):1226-34. PubMed ID: 25761000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prophylactic and therapeutic fixation of weight-bearing long bones with metastatic cancer.
Ampil FL; Sadasivan KK
South Med J; 2001 Apr; 94(4):394-6. PubMed ID: 11332904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Venting during prophylactic nailing for femoral metastases: current orthopedic practice.
Dalgorf D; Borkhoff CM; Stephen DJ; Finkelstein J; Kreder HJ
Can J Surg; 2003 Dec; 46(6):427-31. PubMed ID: 14680349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of simulated metastatic lytic lesions on proximal femoral strength.
Keyak JH; Kaneko TS; Skinner HB; Hoang BH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 459():139-45. PubMed ID: 17545762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The risk assessment of pathological fracture in the proximal femur using a CT-based finite element method.
Kawabata Y; Matsuo K; Nezu Y; Kamiishi T; Inaba Y; Saito T
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Sep; 22(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28688810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Percutaneous cementoplasty complicating the treatment of a pathologic subtrochanteric fracture: a case report.
Dayer R; Peter R
Injury; 2008 Jul; 39(7):801-4. PubMed ID: 18539281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Is There an Association Between Prophylactic Femur Stabilization and Survival in Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease?
Philipp TC; Mikula JD; Doung YC; Gundle KR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Mar; 478(3):540-546. PubMed ID: 32168065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Current orthopaedic management of bony metastases in the proximal third of the femur.
Jonas SC; Mehendale SM; Bick SM; Baker RP
Hip Int; 2017 Feb; 27(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 28218377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Pathological fracture prediction in patients with metastatic lesions can be improved with quantitative computed tomography based computer models.
Tanck E; van Aken JB; van der Linden YM; Schreuder HW; Binkowski M; Huizenga H; Verdonschot N
Bone; 2009 Oct; 45(4):777-83. PubMed ID: 19539798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Structural consequences of endosteal metastatic lesions in long bones.
Hipp JA; McBroom RJ; Cheal EJ; Hayes WC
J Orthop Res; 1989; 7(6):828-37. PubMed ID: 2795323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impending and actual pathological fractures in patients with bone metastases of the long bones. A retrospective study of 233 surgically treated fractures.
Dijstra S; Wiggers T; van Geel BN; Boxma H
Eur J Surg; 1994 Oct; 160(10):535-42. PubMed ID: 7849154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Intramedullary fixation in (impending) femur fractures caused by tumor metastases].
van Doorn R; van der Hulst RR; van den Wildenberg FA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Oct; 138(42):2101-5. PubMed ID: 7969577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative analysis of risk factors for pathological fracture with femoral metastases.
Van der Linden YM; Dijkstra PD; Kroon HM; Lok JJ; Noordijk EM; Leer JW; Marijnen CA
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2004 May; 86(4):566-73. PubMed ID: 15174555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsumoto T; Ohashi S; Matsuyama J; Tobita K; Kaneko M; Nakamura K
Bone; 2009 Aug; 45(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 19398043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
