These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16822143)

  • 41. A semantic mismatch effect on serial recall: Evidence for interlexical processing of irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Körner U; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):515-525. PubMed ID: 29985037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Near-independent capacities and highly constrained output orders in the simultaneous free recall of auditory-verbal and visuo-spatial stimuli.
    Cortis Mack C; Dent K; Ward G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jan; 44(1):107-134. PubMed ID: 28758775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Input and output modes modulate phonological and semantic contributions to immediate serial recall: evidence from a brain-damaged patient.
    Chassé V; Belleville S
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2009 Mar; 26(2):195-216. PubMed ID: 19418315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Phonological similarity neighborhoods and children's short-term memory: typical development and dyslexia.
    Thomson JM; Richardson U; Goswami U
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Oct; 33(7):1210-9. PubMed ID: 16532854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reversing the phonological similarity effect.
    Nairne JS; Kelley MR
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 10087855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Unusual modality effects in less-skilled readers.
    Penney CG; Godsell A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):284-9. PubMed ID: 9949714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Consonant Age-of-Acquisition Effects in Nonword Repetition Are Not Articulatory in Nature.
    Moore MW; Fiez JA; Tompkins CA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 60(11):3198-3212. PubMed ID: 29052729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Calling all codes: interactive effects of semantics, phonology, and orthography produce dissociations in a repetition blindness paradigm.
    Stolz JA; Neely JH
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(1):105-28. PubMed ID: 18437804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Phonological short-term store and the nature of the recency effect: evidence from neuropsychology.
    Vallar G; Papagano C
    Brain Cogn; 1986 Oct; 5(4):428-42. PubMed ID: 3580186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Word-frequency effects on short-term memory tasks: evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall.
    Hulme C; Roodenrys S; Schweickert R; Brown GD; Martin M; Stuart G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Sep; 23(5):1217-32. PubMed ID: 9293631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The Hebb repetition effect in complex span tasks: Evidence for a shared learning mechanism with simple span tasks.
    Araya C; Oberauer K; Saito S
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):925-940. PubMed ID: 34870806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Hebb repetition effect in simple and complex memory span.
    Oberauer K; Jones T; Lewandowsky S
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):852-65. PubMed ID: 25712915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The phonological short-term store-rehearsal system: patterns of impairment and neural correlates.
    Vallar G; Di Betta AM; Silveri MC
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Jun; 35(6):795-812. PubMed ID: 9204486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The contributions of encoding, retention, and recall to the Hebb effect.
    Oberauer K; Meyer N
    Memory; 2009 Oct; 17(7):774-81. PubMed ID: 19598058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Phonological similarity in the serial recall task hinders item recall, not just order.
    Roodenrys S; Guitard D; Miller LM; Saint-Aubin J; Barron JM
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Nov; 113(4):1100-1120. PubMed ID: 35692188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Phonological and visuo-spatial working memory in individuals with intellectual disability.
    Rosenquist C; Conners FA; Roskos-Ewoldsen B
    Am J Ment Retard; 2003 Nov; 108(6):403-13. PubMed ID: 14561108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Hebb repetition learning in adolescents with intellectual disabilities.
    Henry LA; Poloczek S; Messer DJ; Dennan R; Mattiauda E; Danielsson H
    Res Dev Disabil; 2022 Jun; 125():104219. PubMed ID: 35316714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.
    Meltzer JA; Rose NS; Deschamps T; Leigh RC; Panamsky L; Silberberg A; Madani N; Links KA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):307-29. PubMed ID: 26374330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Immunity to proactive interference is not a property of the focus of attention in working memory.
    Ralph A; Walters JN; Stevens A; Fitzgerald KJ; Tehan G; Surprenant AM; Neath I; Turcotte J
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Feb; 39(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 21264609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.