These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16822153)

  • 1. Lack of set size effects in spatial updating: Evidence for offline updating.
    Hodgson E; Waller D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):854-66. PubMed ID: 16822153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two dissociable updating processes in working memory.
    Kessler Y; Meiran N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1339-48. PubMed ID: 18980398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Change blindness and visual memory: visual representations get rich and act poor.
    Varakin DA; Levin DT
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):51-77. PubMed ID: 16464287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Updating of working memory: lingering bindings.
    Oberauer K; Vockenberg K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):967-87. PubMed ID: 19034717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial updating in superimposed real and virtual environments.
    Wan XI; Wang RF; Crowell JA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 19304595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When do spatial and visual working memory interact?
    Wood JN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):420-39. PubMed ID: 21264717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes.
    Makovski T; Sussman R; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):369-80. PubMed ID: 18315412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load.
    Santangelo V; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1311-21. PubMed ID: 18085945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Roles of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations in locomotion and reorientation.
    Mou W; McNamara TP; Rump B; Xiao C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1274-90. PubMed ID: 17087583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective reaching: evidence for multiple frames of reference.
    Keulen RF; Adam JJ; Fischer MH; Kuipers H; Jolles J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):515-26. PubMed ID: 12075885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention.
    Goolkasian P
    Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(3):397-415. PubMed ID: 9339537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thinking outside the body: an advantage for spatial updating during imagined versus physical self-rotation.
    Wraga M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):993-1005. PubMed ID: 14516230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revisiting evidence for modularity and functional equivalence across verbal and spatial domains in memory.
    Guérard K; Tremblay S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):556-69. PubMed ID: 18444756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. All updateable objects in working memory are updated whenever any of them are modified: evidence from the memory updating paradigm.
    Kessler Y; Meiran N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):570-85. PubMed ID: 16719667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: effects of task and available sensory information.
    Waller D; Richardson AR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 18377167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual working memory capacity for objects from different categories: a face-specific maintenance effect.
    Wong JH; Peterson MS; Thompson JC
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):719-31. PubMed ID: 18675409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Allocentric visual cues influence online limb adjustments.
    Heath M; Neely K; Binsted G
    Motor Control; 2007 Jan; 11(1):54-70. PubMed ID: 17392567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
    Sung K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The nature of change detection and online representations of scenes.
    Ryan JD; Cohen NJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):988-1015. PubMed ID: 15462635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.