113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16822163)
1. On blowing trumpets to the tulips: to prove or not to prove the null hypothesis--comment on Bösch, Steinkamp, and Boller (2006).
Wilson DB; Shadish WR
Psychol Bull; 2006 Jul; 132(4):524-8; discussion 533-7. PubMed ID: 16822163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reexamining psychokinesis: comment on Bösch, Steinkamp, and Boller (2006).
Radin D; Nelson R; Dobyns Y; Houtkooper J
Psychol Bull; 2006 Jul; 132(4):529-32; discussion 533-7. PubMed ID: 16822164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examining psychokinesis: the interaction of human intention with random number generators--a meta-analysis.
Bösch H; Steinkamp F; Boller E
Psychol Bull; 2006 Jul; 132(4):497-523. PubMed ID: 16822162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis that conceals more than it reveals: comment on Storm et al. (2010).
Hyman R
Psychol Bull; 2010 Jul; 136(4):486-90. PubMed ID: 20565165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accounting for belief bias in a mental model framework: comment on Klauer, Musch, and Naumer (2000).
Garnham A; Oakhill JV
Psychol Rev; 2005 Apr; 112(2):509-18; discussion 519-20. PubMed ID: 15783296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Processes underlying developmental reversals in false-memory formation: comment on Brainerd, Reyna, and Ceci (2008).
Ghetti S
Psychol Bull; 2008 Sep; 134(5):764-7; discussion 773-7. PubMed ID: 18729572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correcting for indirect range restriction in meta-analysis: testing a new meta-analytic procedure.
Le H; Schmidt FL
Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):416-38. PubMed ID: 17154755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comment: treating "the poor"--classism or a rigid loyalty to theory?
Aronson H
Am Psychol; 2006; 61(4):335-6; discussion 338-9. PubMed ID: 16719683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Should scientists think? Comment on Machado and Silva (2007).
Lau HC
Am Psychol; 2007 Oct; 62(7):686-8; discussion 689-91. PubMed ID: 17924752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The evidence rejects the expertise hypothesis: reply to Gauthier & Bukach.
McKone E; Robbins R
Cognition; 2007 May; 103(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 16842769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rule following and rule use in the balance-scale task.
Shultz TR; Takane Y
Cognition; 2007 Jun; 103(3):460-72. PubMed ID: 17223096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flawed foundations of associationism? Comments on Machado and Silva (2007).
Gallistel CR
Am Psychol; 2007 Oct; 62(7):682-5; discussion 689-91. PubMed ID: 17924751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can manipulations of cognitive load be used to test evolutionary hypotheses?
Barrett HC; Frederick DA; Haselton MG; Kurzban R
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 16938033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the permissiveness of the abductive theory of method.
Haig BD
J Clin Psychol; 2008 Sep; 64(9):1037-45. PubMed ID: 18612973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What must a psychological theory of reasoning explain? Comment on Barrouillet, Gauffroy, and Lecas (2008).
Oberauer K; Oaksford M
Psychol Rev; 2008 Jul; 115(3):773-8; discussion 778. PubMed ID: 18729600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: comment on Wixted (2007).
Parks CM; Yonelinas AP
Psychol Rev; 2007 Jan; 114(1):188-202; discussion 203-9. PubMed ID: 17227187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative and qualitative research: beyond the debate.
Gelo O; Braakmann D; Benetka G
Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2008 Sep; 42(3):266-90. PubMed ID: 18795385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abductive inferences to psychological variables: Steiger's question and best explanations of psychopathy.
Markus KA; Hawes SW; Thasites RJ
J Clin Psychol; 2008 Sep; 64(9):1069-88. PubMed ID: 18618735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward a richer view of the scientific method. The role of conceptual analysis.
Machado A; Silva FJ
Am Psychol; 2007 Oct; 62(7):671-81. PubMed ID: 17924750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comment: positive psychology versus the medical model?
Joseph S; Linley PA
Am Psychol; 2006; 61(4):332-3. PubMed ID: 16719681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
