These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16822990)
21. Preparing for a post-Roe world. Minkoff H; Gibbs RS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):249.e1-249.e3. PubMed ID: 30471257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Big abortion: what the antiabortion movement can learn from big tobacco. Heminger JD Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2005; 54(4):1273-311. PubMed ID: 17115504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Abortion in the United States: barriers to access. Fried MG Health Hum Rights; 2000; 4(2):174-94. PubMed ID: 10796974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The denial of abortion care information, referrals, and services undermines quality care for U.S. women. Weitz TA; Fogel SB Womens Health Issues; 2010; 20(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 20123171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000). Joersz M N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Court rules that government can't outlaw type of abortion: a Nebraska case. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 2000 Jun; ():A1. PubMed ID: 15586921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Insured women and payment for elective abortion. Lee JA; Afable-Munsuz A; Van Bebber SL; Phillips KA Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(5):347-50. PubMed ID: 18468919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test. Burdick R Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Roe v. Wade and the lesson of the pre-Roe case law. Morgan RG Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1724-48. PubMed ID: 10245969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The future of FemTech ethics & privacy - a global perspective. Alfawzan N; Christen M BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):88. PubMed ID: 37891591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A statement on abortion by 100 professors of obstetrics: 40 years later. One Hundred Professors of Obstetrics and Gynecology Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 209(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 23500455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Abortion and Islam: policies and practice in the Middle East and North Africa. Hessini L Reprod Health Matters; 2007 May; 15(29):75-84. PubMed ID: 17512379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Medication Abortion Through Telemedicine: Implications of a Ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court. Yang YT; Kozhimannil KB Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):313-6. PubMed ID: 26942359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Morgentaler v. The Queen in the Supreme Court of Canada. Martin SL Can J Women Law; 1987-1988; 2(2):422-31. PubMed ID: 17076040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The legal status of abortion in the states if Roe v. Wade is overruled. Linton PB Issues Law Med; 2007; 23(1):3-43. PubMed ID: 17703698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Abortion opponents win dispute. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 2006 Mar; ():A14. PubMed ID: 16528875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Location and life: how Stenberg v. Carhart undercut Roe v. Wade. Stith R William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(2):255-78. PubMed ID: 15977326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Navigating Loss of Abortion Services - A Large Academic Medical Center Prepares for the Overturn of Harris LH N Engl J Med; 2022 Jun; 386(22):2061-2064. PubMed ID: 35544368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]