These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16823066)

  • 41. Skin dose and dose-area product values in patients undergoing intracoronary brachytherapy.
    Vano E; Prieto C; Fernandez JM; Gonzalez L; Sabate M; Galvan C
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jan; 76(901):32-8. PubMed ID: 12595323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A study on patients' radiation doses from interventional cardiac procedures in Tabriz, Iran.
    Mesbahi A; Aslanabadi N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 19106178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Increases in patient doses need to be avoided when upgrading interventional cardiology systems to flat detectors.
    Prieto C; Vano E; Fernández JM; Martínez D; Sánchez R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):83-5. PubMed ID: 21733865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Patient skin dosimetry in interventional cardiology in the Czech Republic.
    Sukupova L; Novak L; Kala P; Cervinka P; Stasek J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):106-10. PubMed ID: 21757443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Skin doses to patients undergoing coronary angiography in a Greek hospital.
    Delichas MG; Psarrakos K; Giannoglou G; Molyvda-Athanasopoulou E; Hatziioannou K; Papanastassiou E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(4):449-52. PubMed ID: 15797918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Society of cardiac angiography and interventions: suggested management of the no-reflow phenomenon in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Klein LW; Kern MJ; Berger P; Sanborn T; Block P; Babb J; Tommaso C; Hodgson JM; Feldman T;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Oct; 60(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 14517924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of a conventional and a flat-panel digital system in interventional cardiology procedures.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Koutelou M; Vano E; Neofotistou V
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Jul; 77(919):562-7. PubMed ID: 15238402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Radiation dose from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedure performed using a flat detector for different clinical angiographic projections.
    Varghese A; Livingstone RS; Varghese L; Dey S; Jose J; Thomson VS; George OK; George PV
    J Radiol Prot; 2018 Jun; 38(2):511-524. PubMed ID: 29380743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Factors affecting patient radiation exposure during routine coronary angiography in a tertiary referral centre.
    Clark AL; Brennan AG; Robertson LJ; McArthur JD
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 73(866):184-9. PubMed ID: 10884732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Physicians' radiation exposure in the catheterization lab: does the type of procedure matter?
    Ingwersen M; Drabik A; Kulka U; Oestreicher U; Fricke S; Krankenberg H; Schwencke C; Mathey D
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-102. PubMed ID: 24156970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Preliminary reference levels in interventional cardiology.
    Neofotistou V; Vano E; Padovani R; Kotre J; Dowling A; Toivonen M; Kottou S; Tsapaki V; Willis S; Bernardi G; Faulkner K
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2259-63. PubMed ID: 14534803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effective dose to patient during cardiac interventional procedures (Prague workplaces).
    Stisova V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 15266088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Short communication: time of day influences patient radiation exposure from percutaneous cardiac interventions.
    Kuon E; Dahm JB; Schmitt M; Glaser C; Gefeller O; Pfahlberg A
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 76(903):189-91. PubMed ID: 12684234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Fluoroscopy time -- an overestimated factor for patient radiation exposure in invasive cardiology].
    Kuon E; Robinson DM; Empen K; Dahm JB
    Rofo; 2005 Jun; 177(6):812-7. PubMed ID: 15902630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Method of patient dose evaluation in the angiographic and interventional radiology procedures.
    Rivolta A; Emanuelli S; Tessarin C; Bresciani S; Genovese MG; Rogge D; Scielzo G
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):689-98. PubMed ID: 16437054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Review of patient dosimetry in cardiology.
    Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):177-82. PubMed ID: 11487831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluating the maximum patient radiation dose in cardiac interventional procedures.
    Kato M; Chida K; Sato T; Oosaka H; Tosa T; Kadowaki K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jan; 143(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 20947586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. SKIN DOSE, EFFECTIVE DOSE AND RELATED RISK IN TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION (TAVI) PROCEDURES: IS THE CANCER RISK ACCEPTABLE FOR YOUNGER PATIENTS?
    Karambatsakidou A; Omar A; Chehrazi B; Rück A; Scherp Nilsson J; Fransson A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):225-31. PubMed ID: 26743262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Dosimetric characterization of GafChromic EBT film and its implication on film dosimetry quality assurance.
    Fuss M; Sturtewagen E; De Wagter C; Georg D
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4211-25. PubMed ID: 17664604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of Kodak EDR2 and Gafchromic EBT film for intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose distribution verification.
    Sankar A; Ayyangar KM; Nehru RM; Kurup PG; Murali V; Enke CA; Velmurugan J
    Med Dosim; 2006; 31(4):273-82. PubMed ID: 17134667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.