These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16823230)

  • 1. Effect of enamel preparations on fracture resistance of composite resin buildup of fractures involving dentine in anterior bovine teeth: an in vitro study.
    Gandhi K; Nandlal B
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2006 Jun; 24(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 16823230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Class IV preparations for fractured anterior teeth restored with composite resin restorations.
    Eid H; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2003; 27(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 12739678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reattachment of anterior fractured teeth: effect of materials and techniques on impact strength.
    Bruschi-Alonso RC; Alonso RC; Correr GM; Alves MC; Lewgoy HR; Sinhoreti MA; Puppin-Rontani RM; Correr-Sobrinho L
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Aug; 26(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 20662884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention of composite resin restorations in class IV preparations.
    Eid H
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002; 26(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11990047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture strength of tooth fragment reattachments with postpone bevel and overcontour reconstruction.
    Stellini E; Stomaci D; Stomaci M; Petrone N; Favero L
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Jun; 24(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 18489478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of reattached incisor fragments with mini fibre-reinforced composite anchors.
    Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Wolke JG; Fokkinga WA; Machado C; Creugers NH
    J Dent; 2009 Jun; 37(6):462-7. PubMed ID: 19339099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments--influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation.
    Demarco FF; Fay RM; Pinzon LM; Powers JM
    Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 15144447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Enamel Preparations - Bevel, Chamfer and Stair Step Chamfer on Fracture Resistance of Nano Filled Resin Composites Using Bulk Pack Technique - An In Vitro Study.
    Bommanagoudar J; Chandrashekhar S; Sharma S; Jain H
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2019 Dec; 7(23):4089-4093. PubMed ID: 32165958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of composite resin restorations and porcelain veneers in relation to residual tooth structure in fractured incisors.
    Batalocco G; Lee H; Ercoli C; Feng C; Malmstrom H
    Dent Traumatol; 2012 Feb; 28(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 21752192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental evaluation of two methodologies for the restoration of crown fracture in permanent anterior teeth.
    Stellini E; De Francesco M; Sivolella S; Ferro R; Denotti G; Oberholtzer D; Mazzoleni S
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Jun; 13(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 22762168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of cavity design on the biomechanics of direct composite resin restorations in Class IV preparations.
    Xu H; Jiang Z; Xiao X; Fu J; Su Q
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2012 Apr; 120(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 22409223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different techniques.
    Reis A; Francci C; Loguercio AD; Carrilho MR; Rodriques Filho LE
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 11357572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reattachment of fractured anterior teeth-determining fracture strength using different techniques: an in vitro study.
    Srilatha ; Joshi S; Chhasatia N; Rani PJ; Mathur E
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 22430695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Class II composite restorations: importance of cervical enamel in vitro.
    Laegreid T; Gjerdet NR; Vult von Steyern P; Johansson AK
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 21777100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure.
    Ozcan M; Schoonbeek G; Gökçe B; Cömlekoglu E; Dündar M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 21180005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design.
    Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of techniques used for re-attachment of endodontically treated crown fractured teeth.
    Loguercio AD; Leski G; Sossmeier D; Kraul A; Oda M; Patzlaff RT; Reis A
    J Dent; 2008 Apr; 36(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 18308450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
    Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of dentine depth on the fracture toughness of dentine-composite adhesive interfaces.
    Tam LE; Yim D
    J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):339-46. PubMed ID: 9175366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.