BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16823269)

  • 1. Modeling a potential atmospheric release from a waste disposal facility at the savannah river site as an area source.
    Simpkins AA; Lee PL
    Health Phys; 2006 Aug; 91(2 Suppl):S32-4. PubMed ID: 16823269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Illustrative assessment of human health issues arising from the potential release of chemotoxic substances from a generic geological disposal facility for radioactive waste.
    Wilson JC; Thorne MC; Towler G; Norris S
    J Radiol Prot; 2011 Dec; 31(4):411-30. PubMed ID: 22089948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kalman filtration of radiation monitoring data from atmospheric dispersion of radioactive materials.
    Drews M; Lauritzen B; Madsen H; Smith JQ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 15266085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ambient environmental profile for the Savannah River Site.
    Rollins EM
    Health Phys; 2008 Jul; 95(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 18545030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of the source rate released into the environment from a nuclear power plant.
    Jeong HJ; Kim EH; Suh KS; Hwang WT; Han MH; Lee HK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 15687109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Worker and environmental protection issues in the remediation of an abandoned source manufacturing facility.
    Hoffman DE
    Health Phys; 2003 Feb; 84(2 Suppl):S30-6. PubMed ID: 12564344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benchmarking of MCNP for calculating dose rates at an interim storage facility for nuclear waste.
    Heuel-Fabianek B; Hille R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):424-7. PubMed ID: 16381760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test case of the long term preliminary performance assessment for the L&IL radioactive waste repository Baita Bihor, Romania.
    Ene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):433-6. PubMed ID: 16403732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Solutions to the Gaussian cloud approximation for gamma absorbed dose.
    Overcamp TJ
    Health Phys; 2007 Jan; 92(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 17164603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of radon exposures to workers at the Fernald Feed Materials Production Center 1952-1988.
    Hornung RW; Pinney SM; Lodwick J; Killough GG; Brewer DE; Nasuta J
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 18(5):512-23. PubMed ID: 18183043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contribution to a more realistic approach in assessing the release of C-14 from low-level radioactive waste repositories.
    Bracke G; Müller W
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Dec; 102(3-4):210-6. PubMed ID: 19022527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding the toxicity of buried radioactive waste.
    Cohen BL
    Health Phys; 2006 Oct; 91(4):394-6. PubMed ID: 16966886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probabilistic risk assessment for long-range atmospheric transport of radionuclides.
    Lauritzen B; Baklanov A; Mahura A; Mikkelsen T; Sørensen JH
    J Environ Radioact; 2007; 96(1-3):110-5. PubMed ID: 17482728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Current Center of Site Annual Neshap Dose Modeling at the Savannah River Site with Other Assessment Methods.
    Minter KM; Jannik GT; Stagich BH; Dixon KL; Newton JR
    Health Phys; 2018 Apr; 114(4):408-413. PubMed ID: 29481531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation impact caused by activation of air from the future GSI accelerator facility fair.
    Gutermuth F; Wildermuth H; Radon T; Fehrenbacher G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):437-40. PubMed ID: 16381762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can the confidence in long range atmospheric transport models be increased? The pan-european experience of ensemble.
    Galmarini S; Bianconi R; Klug W; Mikkelsen T; Addis R; Andronopoulos S; Astrup P; Baklanov A; Bartniki J; Bartzis JC; Bellasio R; Bompay F; Buckley R; Bouzom M; Champion H; D'Amours R; Davakis E; Eleveld H; Geertsema GT; Glaab H; Kollax M; Ilvonen M; Manning A; Pechinger U; Persson C; Polreich E; Potemski S; Prodanova M; Saltbones J; Slaper H; Sofiev MA; Syrakov D; Sørensen JH; Van der Auwera L; Valkama I; Zelazny R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):19-24. PubMed ID: 15238650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculation of total effective dose equivalent and collective dose in the event of a LOCA in Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant.
    Raisali G; Davilu H; Haghighishad A; Khodadadi R; Sabet M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 16785243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An estimation method of the gross Beta activity in receiving river water of a nuclear power plant.
    Huang YJ; Tao YL; Zhang XF; Shang-Guan ZH
    Health Phys; 2010 Aug; 99 Suppl 2():S143-8. PubMed ID: 20622562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterisation of radioactive waste products associated with plant decommissioning.
    Sejvar J; Fero AH; Gil C; Hagler RJ; Santiago JL; Holgado A; Swenson R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):481-5. PubMed ID: 16381771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incineration and monitoring of low-level 35S wastes at a biological research institution.
    Hamrick PE; Wall BE; Simon SL
    Health Phys; 1989 Jul; 57(1):191-4. PubMed ID: 2745082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.