These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16824171)

  • 1. An instrument for assessing public health system performance: validity in rural settings.
    Driscoll D; Rojas-Smith L; Sotnikov S; Gadsden-Knowles K; Perry NB; Lenaway DD; Halverson PK
    J Rural Health; 2006; 22(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 16824171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The forgotten instrument: analysis of the national public health performance standards program governance instrument.
    Beckett AB; Scutchfield FD; Pfeifle W; Hill R; Ingram RC
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2008; 14(4):E17-22. PubMed ID: 18552639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Creating and validating practical measures for assessing public health practices in local communities.
    Miller CA; Richards TB; Christenson GM; Koch GG
    Am J Prev Med; 1995; 11(6 Suppl):24-8. PubMed ID: 8776138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ensuring the success of local public health workforce assessments: using a participatory-based research approach with a rural population.
    Alejos A; Weingartner A; Scharff DP; Ablah E; Frazier L; Hawley SR; St Romain T; Orr SA; Wright KS
    Public Health; 2008 Dec; 122(12):1447-55. PubMed ID: 18752816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating local public health performance at a community level on a statewide basis.
    Richards TB; Rogers JJ; Christenson GM; Miller CA; Taylor MS; Cooper AD
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 1995; 1(4):70-83. PubMed ID: 10186646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Content and criterion validity evaluation of National Public Health Performance Standards measurement instruments.
    Beaulieu J; Scutchfield FD; Kelly AV
    Public Health Rep; 2003; 118(6):508-17. PubMed ID: 14563908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A strategy for measuring local public health practice.
    Handler AS; Turnock BJ; Hall W; Potsic S; Munson J; Nalluri R; Vaughn EH
    Am J Prev Med; 1995; 11(6 Suppl):29-35. PubMed ID: 8776139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Essential medicolegal death investigation services: standardization of a survey instrument based on the Essential Public Health Services.
    Drake SA; Nolte KB
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):1034-40. PubMed ID: 21496017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The development of a survey instrument for community health improvement.
    Bazos DA; Weeks WB; Fisher ES; DeBlois HA; Hamilton E; Young MJ
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Aug; 36(4):773-92. PubMed ID: 11508639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A screening survey to assess local public health performance.
    Miller CA; Moore KS; Richards TB; McKaig C
    Public Health Rep; 1994; 109(5):659-64. PubMed ID: 7938387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A self-assessment process for accreditation preparedness: a practical example for local health departments.
    Erwin PC;
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2009; 15(6):503-8. PubMed ID: 19823155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New data, same story? Revisiting studies on the relationship of local public health systems characteristics to public health performance.
    Bhandari MW; Scutchfield FD; Charnigo R; Riddell MC; Mays GP
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 20150791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aligning public health financing with essential public health service functions and National Public Health Performance Standards.
    Brooks RG; Beitsch LM; Street P; Chukmaitov A
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2009; 15(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 19525774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of validity of the national public health performance standards: the local public health performance assessment instrument.
    Beaulieu J; Scutchfield FD
    Public Health Rep; 2002; 117(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 12297679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Piloting a state health department accreditation model: the North Carolina experience.
    Reed J; Pavletic D; Devlin L; Davis MV; Beitsch LM; Baker EL
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2009; 15(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 19202406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Refinement, scoring, and validation of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU) survey.
    Wall RJ; Engelberg RA; Downey L; Heyland DK; Curtis JR
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):271-9. PubMed ID: 17133189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].
    Giraldes Mdo R
    Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surrounded by quality metrics: what do surgeons think of ACS-NSQIP?
    Neuman HB; Michelassi F; Turner JW; Bass BL
    Surgery; 2009 Jan; 145(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 19081472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.