144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16824212)
1. No evidence for learned mating discrimination in male Drosophila pseudoobscura.
Kandul NP; Wright KM; Kandul EV; Noor MA
BMC Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 6():54. PubMed ID: 16824212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Drosophila melanogaster males respond differently at the behavioural and genome-wide levels to Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans females.
Ellis LL; Carney GE
J Evol Biol; 2009 Nov; 22(11):2183-91. PubMed ID: 19765174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Female mate recognition and sexual isolation depending on courtship song in Drosophila sechellia and its siblings.
Tomaru M; Yamada H; Oguma Y
Genes Genet Syst; 2004 Jun; 79(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 15329495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learning decreases heterospecific courtship and mating in fruit flies.
Dukas R
Biol Lett; 2008 Dec; 4(6):645-7. PubMed ID: 18842572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. GENETICS OF SEXUAL ISOLATION AND COURTSHIP DYSFUNCTION IN MALE HYBRIDS OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA AND DROSOPHILA PERSIMILIS.
Noor MAF
Evolution; 1997 Jun; 51(3):809-815. PubMed ID: 28568570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Courtship song recognition in the Drosophila melanogaster complex: heterospecific songs make females receptive in D. melanogaster, but not in D. sechellia.
Tomaru M; Doi M; Higuchi H; Oguma Y
Evolution; 2000 Aug; 54(4):1286-94. PubMed ID: 11005295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Courtship songs of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. II. Genetics of species differences.
Williams MA; Blouin AG; Noor MA
Heredity (Edinb); 2001 Jan; 86(Pt 1):68-77. PubMed ID: 11298817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
Lorch PD; Servedio MR
Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An X chromosome effect responsible for asymmetric reproductive isolation between male Drosophila virilis and heterospecific females.
Nickel D; Civetta A
Genome; 2009 Jan; 52(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 19132071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic analysis of mate discrimination in Drosophila simulans.
Chu Y; Yang E; Schinaman JM; Chahda JS; Sousa-Neves R
Evolution; 2013 Aug; 67(8):2335-47. PubMed ID: 23888855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Courtship song and mating speed in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.
von Schilcher F; Manning A
Behav Genet; 1975 Oct; 5(4):395-404. PubMed ID: 811205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of courtship song in female mate choice in South American Cactophilic Drosophila.
Iglesias PP; Hasson E
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176119. PubMed ID: 28467464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sexual isolation between North American and Bogota strains of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
Kim YK; Ruiz-García M; Alvarez D; Phillips DR; Anderson WW
Behav Genet; 2012 May; 42(3):472-82. PubMed ID: 22065259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Male mate choice via cuticular hydrocarbon pheromones drives reproductive isolation between Drosophila species.
Shahandeh MP; Pischedda A; Turner TL
Evolution; 2018 Jan; 72(1):123-135. PubMed ID: 29098691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mutual interest between the sexes and reproductive success in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
Gowaty PA; Steinichen R; Anderson WW
Evolution; 2002 Dec; 56(12):2537-40. PubMed ID: 12583593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Plasticity of the mate choice mind: courtship evokes choice-like brain responses in females from a coercive mating system.
Wang SM; Ramsey ME; Cummings ME
Genes Brain Behav; 2014 Apr; 13(4):365-75. PubMed ID: 24548673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fitness effects of female mate choice: preferred males are detrimental for Drosophila melanogaster females.
Friberg U; Arnqvist G
J Evol Biol; 2003 Sep; 16(5):797-811. PubMed ID: 14635895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of female cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profile on male courtship behavior in two hybridizing field crickets Gryllus firmus and Gryllus pennsylvanicus.
Heggeseth B; Sim D; Partida L; Maroja LS
BMC Evol Biol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):21. PubMed ID: 32019492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alternative reproductive tactics in male freshwater fish influence the accuracy of species recognition.
Fujimoto S; Tsurui-Sato K; Katsube N; Tatsuta H; Tsuji K
Ecol Evol; 2021 May; 11(9):3884-3900. PubMed ID: 33976782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
