These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. New developments in intrauterine devices. Farr G Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1991 Sep; 12(2):9. PubMed ID: 12284281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparison of C-reactive protein levels in pregnancies with retained and removed intrauterine device. Deveer R; Engin-Ustun Y; Sarikaya E; Aydogan P; Doğanay M; Mollamahmutoğlu L J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1152-4. PubMed ID: 21231846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Statement on intrauterine devices (IUDs). International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP IPPF Med Bull; 1987 Dec; 21(6):3-5. PubMed ID: 12268853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Letter: Lost IUD. Kaplan NR Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Apr; 47(4):508-9. PubMed ID: 1256735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Intrauterine device developments. Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1984; 5(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 12313225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Comparison of family physicians' and gynecologists' use of the intrauterine device (IUD)]. Menéndez Villalva C; Fernández Domínguez MJ; Doval Conde XL; Blanco Pérez S; García Machi A; Gulín González R Aten Primaria; 1998 Dec; 22(10):622-6. PubMed ID: 9931556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Assessment of the performance of a copper intrauterine device: MLCu 375]. Audebert A; Emperaire JC; Larue-charlus S Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1985 Jan; 13(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12266608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Indications for removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices in Jos, north-central Nigeria. Mutihir JT; Ujah IA; Uduagbamen PF; Iranloye T Niger J Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 9(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 17319339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Clinical applications of Lin's forceps in flexible hysteroscopy. Lin BL; Iwata Y; Valle RF J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1994 Aug; 1(4 Pt 1):383-7. PubMed ID: 9138880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial. Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Removal of incarcerated intrauterine devices by combined methods]. Liu MM Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1993 Jan; 28(1):44-6, 61. PubMed ID: 8504711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Current status of frameless anchored IUD for immediate intracesarean insertion. Wildemeersch D; Goldstuck ND; Hasskamp T Dev Period Med; 2016; 20(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 27416620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Efficiency and acceptability of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Trutko NS Acta Med Hung; 1986; 43(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 3588154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [The effect of intrauterine contraceptive devices on the endometrium]. Sheppard BL; Bonnar J Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Nov; 15(11):1015-24. PubMed ID: 12341565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?]. Forrest JD Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]