These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16824297)

  • 81. Does the choice of forceps during IUD insertion affect pain scores?
    Ma R
    Practitioner; 2016 Nov; 260(1798):9. PubMed ID: 28968047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Missing IUS arms?
    Torbé EJ; Eddowes H; Aston K
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2009 Apr; 35(2):131; author reply 131. PubMed ID: 19356301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Comparative analysis of copper intrauterine device impact on female sexual dysfunction subtypes.
    Sakinci M; Ercan CM; Olgan S; Coksuer H; Karasahin KE; Kuru O
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 55(3):460-1. PubMed ID: 27343342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. [Guideline for the removal of intrauterine device after menopause].
    Chinese Society of Family Planning, Chinese Medical Association
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 54(10):649-653. PubMed ID: 31648439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Comment on 'Incomplete IUS removal'.
    Brechin S
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2014 Oct; 40(4):309. PubMed ID: 25240034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Re: Dueñas-Garcia OF, Young C. 2012. Unusual finding of a metallic intrauterine device in postmenopausal bleeding. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 32:401-402.
    Ko JK; Cheung VY
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Oct; 32(7):716. PubMed ID: 22943737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Endoscopy Biopsy Forceps as a Tool for Covered Iliac Stent Removal.
    Troisi N; Adami D; Berchiolli R
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2022 May; 63(5):782. PubMed ID: 35490112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Risk factors for intrauterine device failure: a review.
    Gupta S
    Contraception; 2002 Nov; 66(5):385; author reply 385-6. PubMed ID: 12443972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. [A rival of the forceps in the history of obstetrics: Esparragosa's elastic loop].
    MARIOTTI M
    Minerva Ginecol; 1953 Mar; 5(5):202. PubMed ID: 13071796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Intrauterine device development.
    Kurz KH
    Fertil Steril; 1984 May; 41(5):787. PubMed ID: 6714460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Retained Diabetes Devices-A Literature Review.
    Xu NY; Nguyen KT; Krouwer JS; Akturk HK; Shah VN; Klonoff DC
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2023 Nov; 17(6):1676-1685. PubMed ID: 35787699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Training for the LoC IUT.
    Devonald B
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2008 Apr; 34(2):136. PubMed ID: 18413048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. [A competitor of the forceps in the history of obstetrics: the elastic loop of Esparragosa].
    MARIOTTI M
    Accad Medica; 1953 Feb; 68(2):64-6. PubMed ID: 13050268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Intrauterine contraceptive devices. A method of localization.
    Rosen E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1965 Nov; 93(6):896-7. PubMed ID: 5845219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Improved instruments for the diagnosis of pelvic lesions by the hysterogram and water hysteroscope.
    NORMENT WB
    N C Med J; 1949 Dec; 10(12):646-9, illust. PubMed ID: 15397729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Recent changes in availability of IUDs in the UK.
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2001 Apr; 27(2):98. PubMed ID: 12457521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. [Presentation of a monocular colposcope with direct vision and variable magnification].
    PECKER A
    C R Soc Fr Gyncol; 1952 Feb; 22(2):81-2. PubMed ID: 14945170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. A new form of intrauterine device.
    Osler M; Lebech PE
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1966; 45(S9):31-5. PubMed ID: 5958392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. The association of intrauterine device usage with bacterial vaginosis in a gynecology outpatient clinic in Ankara, Turkey.
    Gozalan A; Zarakolu P; Dincer S; Sovuksu K; Cakir B; Esen B
    Ann Saudi Med; 2003; 23(5):315-7. PubMed ID: 16868405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. A novel device for removal of the retained intrauterine device.
    Konamme SP; Auld BJ; Zaidi J
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2006 Apr; 32(2):87-8. PubMed ID: 16824297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.