255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1682553)
1. Can meta-analyses be trusted?
Thompson SG; Pocock SJ
Lancet; 1991 Nov; 338(8775):1127-30. PubMed ID: 1682553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis.
Tang JL; Liu JL
J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 May; 53(5):477-84. PubMed ID: 10812319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-analysis in the design and monitoring of clinical trials.
DerSimonian R
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1237-48; discussion 1249-52. PubMed ID: 8817798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
Ioannidis JP
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century": discussion. A plea for a more balanced view of meta-analysis and systematic overviews of the effect of health care interventions.
Liberati A
J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 7853051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. "Large-scale randomized evidence: large, simple trials and overviews of trials": discussion. A clinician's perspective on meta-analyses.
Horwitz RI
J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 7853046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Interpretation of data from multiple trials: a critical review.
Conn HO
J Intern Med; 1997 Mar; 241(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 9104430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A simple technique investigating baseline heterogeneity helped to eliminate potential bias in meta-analyses.
Hicks A; Fairhurst C; Torgerson DJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():55-62. PubMed ID: 29032245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Meta-analyses of clinical drug trials--gold standard reviews or statistical alchemy?
Chan ES
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2000 Sep; 29(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 11126696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic and non-genetic risk factors for pre-eclampsia: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Giannakou K; Evangelou E; Papatheodorou SI
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 51(6):720-730. PubMed ID: 29143991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in clinical trials mandated by the advent of meta-analysis.
Chalmers TC; Lau J
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1263-8; discussion 1269-72. PubMed ID: 8817800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analysis and endocrinology.
Petitti DB
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am; 1997 Mar; 26(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 9074851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Heterogeneity in ecological and evolutionary meta-analyses: its magnitude and implications.
Senior AM; Grueber CE; Kamiya T; Lagisz M; O'Dwyer K; Santos ES; Nakagawa S
Ecology; 2016 Dec; 97(12):3293-3299. PubMed ID: 27912008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical primer: methodology and reporting of meta-analyses.
Buccheri S; Sodeck GH; Capodanno D
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Apr; 53(4):708-713. PubMed ID: 29538746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Invited review: Use of meta-analysis in animal health and reproduction: methods and applications.
Lean IJ; Rabiee AR; Duffield TF; Dohoo IR
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Aug; 92(8):3545-65. PubMed ID: 19620636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adding up the evidence: systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Noordzij M; Zoccali C; Dekker FW; Jager KJ
Nephron Clin Pract; 2011; 119(4):c310-6. PubMed ID: 22135790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Meta-analysis: principles and pitfalls].
Opstelten W; Scholten RJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 158(6):A6882. PubMed ID: 24495372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part II--Is all that glitters gold?
Papageorgiou SN
J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 25404669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice.
Higgins J; Thompson S; Deeks J; Altman D
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2002 Jan; 7(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 11822262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
