These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. [How to read a meta-analysis?]. Moulis G; Sommet A Rev Med Interne; 2014 Apr; 35(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 24029290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Indiscriminate data aggregations in meta-analysis. A cause for concern among policy makers and social scientists. Lopez-Lee D Eval Rev; 2002 Oct; 26(5):520-44. PubMed ID: 12243106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Understanding research synthesis (meta-analysis). Mosteller F; Colditz GA Annu Rev Public Health; 1996; 17():1-23. PubMed ID: 8724213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Controversy and debate on credibility ceilings. Paper 1: Fundamental problems with the "credibility ceiling" method for meta-analyses. Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():208-210. PubMed ID: 32450128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression. Baker WL; White CM; Cappelleri JC; Kluger J; Coleman CI; Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Oct; 63(10):1426-34. PubMed ID: 19769699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies. van Assen MA; van Aert RC; Wicherts JM Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 25401773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. Greenland S Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Aug; 140(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 8030632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Application of credibility ceilings probes the robustness of meta-analyses of biomarkers and cancer risk. Papatheodorou SI; Tsilidis KK; Evangelou E; Ioannidis JP J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 25433443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey. Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA CMAJ; 2007 Apr; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century. Feinstein AR J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 7853050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Robust meta-analytic conclusions mandate the provision of prediction intervals in meta-analysis summaries. Graham PL; Moran JL J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 22265586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials. Donner A; Klar N Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(19):2971-80. PubMed ID: 12325113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The heterogeneity statistic I(2) can be biased in small meta-analyses. von Hippel PT BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():35. PubMed ID: 25880989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]