These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16825744)

  • 21. Chamber-quality factors in 60Co for three plane-parallel chambers for the dosimetry of electrons, protons and heavier charged particles: PENELOPE Monte Carlo simulations.
    Panettieri V; Sempau J; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(21):5917-26. PubMed ID: 18836218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of air cavity size in cylindrical ionization chambers on the measurements in high-energy radiotherapy photon beams--an experimental study.
    Swanpalmer J; Johansson KA
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 57(14):4671-81. PubMed ID: 22750728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigation of correction factors for non-reference conditions in ion chamber photon dosimetry with Monte-Carlo simulations.
    Wulff J; Heverhagen JT; Karle H; Zink K
    Z Med Phys; 2010; 20(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 20211423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Possibility of using cylindrical ionization chambers for percent depth-dose measurements in clinical electron beams.
    Ono T; Araki F; Yoshiyama F
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4647-54. PubMed ID: 21928637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Monte Carlo simulated beam quality and perturbation correction factors for ionization chambers in monoenergetic proton beams.
    Kretschmer J; Dulkys A; Brodbek L; Stelljes TS; Looe HK; Poppe B
    Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5890-5905. PubMed ID: 32989779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A beam source model for scanned proton beams.
    Kimstrand P; Traneus E; Ahnesjö A; Grusell E; Glimelius B; Tilly N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3151-68. PubMed ID: 17505095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effective point of measurement of cylindrical ionization chambers for heavy charged particles.
    Jäkel O; Hartmann GH; Heeg P; Schardt D
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Mar; 45(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 10730959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comments on 'The effective depth of cylindrical ionization chambers in water for clinical proton beams'.
    Palmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):7219-24. PubMed ID: 23059383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fluence correction factors in plastic phantoms for clinical proton beams.
    Palmans H; Symons JE; Denis JM; de Kock EA; Jones DT; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3055-71. PubMed ID: 12361210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT4.
    Baumann KS; Kaupa S; Bach C; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 65(5):055015. PubMed ID: 31962306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.
    Ahmad M; Deng J; Lund MW; Chen Z; Kimmett J; Moran MS; Nath R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 19098353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experimental validation of beam quality correction factors for proton beams.
    Gomà C; Hofstetter-Boillat B; Safai S; Vörös S
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3207-16. PubMed ID: 25813370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microionization chamber for reference dosimetry in IMRT verification: clinical implications on OAR dosimetric errors.
    Sánchez-Doblado F; Capote R; Leal A; Roselló JV; Lagares JI; Arráns R; Hartmann GH
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):959-70. PubMed ID: 15798268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Monte Carlo dose calculations for spot scanned proton therapy.
    Tourovsky A; Lomax AJ; Schneider U; Pedroni E
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):971-81. PubMed ID: 15798269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning.
    Fragoso M; Wen N; Kumar S; Liu D; Ryu S; Movsas B; Munther A; Chetty IJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4445-64. PubMed ID: 20668343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fluence correction factors and stopping power ratios for clinical ion beams.
    Lühr A; Hansen DC; Sobolevsky N; Palmans H; Rossomme S; Bassler N
    Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):797-805. PubMed ID: 21767177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Experimental determination of the effective point of measurement of cylindrical ionization chambers for high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huang Y; Willomitzer C; Zakaria GA; Hartmann GH
    Phys Med; 2010; 26(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 19926506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A systematic Monte Carlo study of secondary electron fluence perturbation in clinical proton beams (70-250 MeV) for cylindrical and spherical ion chambers.
    Verhaegen F; Palmans H
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2088-95. PubMed ID: 11695770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ionization chamber dosimetry of proton beams using cylindrical and plane parallel chambers. Nw versus Nk ion chamber calibrations.
    Medin J; Andreo P; Grusell E; Mattsson O; Montelius A; Roos M
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jul; 40(7):1161-76. PubMed ID: 7568375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.