These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16826673)

  • 1. Increasing distractor strength improves accuracy.
    Sheremata S; Sakagami M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Apr; 102(2):509-16. PubMed ID: 16826673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: the efficiency of selective inhibition.
    Hay JL; Milders MM; Sahraie A; Niedeggen M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):885-907. PubMed ID: 16846286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning to filter out visual distractors.
    Gál V; Kozák LR; Kóbor I; Bankó EM; Serences JT; Vidnyánszky Z
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 29(8):1723-31. PubMed ID: 19385991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The fate of task-irrelevant visual motion: perceptual load versus feature-based attention.
    Taya S; Adams WJ; Graf EW; Lavie N
    J Vis; 2009 Nov; 9(12):12.1-10. PubMed ID: 20053103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Redundancy effects of a moving distractor generated by alerting and orienting.
    Utochkin IS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1825-30. PubMed ID: 19933565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distractor-induced blindness for orientation changes and coherent motion.
    Michael L; Hesselmann G; Kiefer M; Niedeggen M
    Vision Res; 2011 Aug; 51(15):1781-7. PubMed ID: 21703293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target.
    Nagy AL; Neriani KE; Young TL
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1885-99. PubMed ID: 15797778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatiotemporal rivalry: a perceptual conflict involving illusory moving and static forms.
    Arnold DH; Erskine HE; Roseboom W; Wallis TS
    Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):692-9. PubMed ID: 20483848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two Simon tasks: neuronal correlates of conflict resolution based on coherent motion perception.
    Wittfoth M; Buck D; Fahle M; Herrmann M
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):921-9. PubMed ID: 16677831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motion and color generate coactivation at postgrouping identification stages.
    Poom L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1833-42. PubMed ID: 21533630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the quantitative relation between incongruent information and response time.
    Kerzel D; Weigelt M; Bosbach S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):267-79. PubMed ID: 16438922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Change detection evokes a Simon-like effect.
    Galfano G; Mazza V; Tamè L; Umiltà C; Turatto M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):186-96. PubMed ID: 17573027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptability and specificity of inhibition processes in distractor-induced blindness.
    Winther GN; Niedeggen M
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1882-1898. PubMed ID: 28892157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect.
    Gevers W; Lammertyn J; Notebaert W; Verguts T; Fias W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 16423320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Velocity-dependent improvements in single-dot direction discrimination.
    Matthews N; Welch L
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jan; 59(1):60-72. PubMed ID: 9038408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: an attentional blink study.
    Jiang Y; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):664-79. PubMed ID: 11424653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks.
    Hübner R; Lehle C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.