These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1682768)

  • 1. Mammographic screening in Italy.
    Franceschi S; Geddes M
    Lancet; 1991 Nov; 338(8779):1402-3. PubMed ID: 1682768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The mammographic screening project in 2 local health units of Piemonte].
    Castiglione F; Destefanis M; Marenco D; Gosso P; Manera G; Porcile G
    Epidemiol Prev; 1996; 20(2-3):157-9. PubMed ID: 8766310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Mammographic screening and the Pap test combined: the experience of Empoli].
    Salvadori P
    Epidemiol Prev; 1996; 20(2-3):150-1. PubMed ID: 8766307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Mammographic examinations in Denmark, 1990-1991].
    Andreasen AH; Andersen KW; Madsen M; Mouridsen HT; Olesen KP; Lynge E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Oct; 156(44):6517-20. PubMed ID: 7825250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammographic surveillance of asymptomatic breast cancer relatives in general practice: rate of re-attendance and GP- and patient-related barriers.
    Duijm LE; Guit GL; Zaat JO
    Fam Pract; 1997 Dec; 14(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 9476075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Schematization and forcing of the analysis of mammographic screening effectiveness].
    Liberati A
    Epidemiol Prev; 2002; 26(2):53-4. PubMed ID: 12125384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Routine mammography screening increases except among minorities and the elderly.
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2002 Jan; 16(1):63, 123. PubMed ID: 11831611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of a subsidised mammographic screening programme in Malaysia, a middle-income Asian country.
    Lee M; Mariapun S; Rajaram N; Teo SH; Yip CH
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Jan; 17(1):127. PubMed ID: 28129762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast-screening brawl.
    Sowinski J
    Science; 1997 Mar; 275(5307):1721. PubMed ID: 9122673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of false-positive screening mammograms on rescreening in Western Australia.
    Dunn NA
    Med J Aust; 2012 Nov; 197(9):490-1. PubMed ID: 23121577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Mammographic screening: results and perspectives].
    Rosselli del Turco M
    Radiol Med; 1991 Mar; 81(3):346-9. PubMed ID: 2014344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography and clinical breast examinations among women aged 50 years and older--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1992.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1993 Oct; 42(38):737-41. PubMed ID: 8371707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does breast cancer screening depend on a wobbly hypothesis?
    Clowes J; Varlow J
    J Public Health Med; 1998 Dec; 20(4):487-9. PubMed ID: 9923961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammography screening in Italy: 2007 survey.
    Giorgi D; Giordano L; Ventura L; Frigerio A; Paci E; Zappa M
    Epidemiol Prev; 2009; 33(3 Suppl 2):13-28. PubMed ID: 19776484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer mortality declining but screening among subpopulations lags.
    Skaer TL; Robison LM; Sclar DA; Harding GH
    Am J Public Health; 1998 Feb; 88(2):307-8. PubMed ID: 9491032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefits of screening mammography: a review for the primary care physician.
    Reichle JL
    South Med J; 1998 Jun; 91(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 9634110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening mammography: controversies and headlines.
    Jackson VP
    Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):323-6. PubMed ID: 12409561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Re: International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs.
    Onysko J; Bancej CM; Pim CP
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(3):238; author reply 238-9. PubMed ID: 14759996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of uptake of breast screening, cervical screening, and childhood immunisation.
    Rudiman R; Gilbert FJ; Ritchie LD
    BMJ; 1995 Jan; 310(6974):229. PubMed ID: 7866127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. False-positive mammographic screening: factors influencing re-attendance over a decade of screening.
    Fitzpatrick P; Fleming P; O'Neill S; Kiernan D; Mooney T
    J Med Screen; 2011; 18(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 21536814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.