These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16828100)

  • 1. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring vs. intermittent auscultation in postcesarean pregnancies.
    Madaan M; Trivedi SS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Aug; 94(2):123-5. PubMed ID: 16828100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis.
    Bader TJ; Morgan MA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):643; author reply 643-4. PubMed ID: 7898851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis.
    Goodlin RC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):643; author reply 643-4. PubMed ID: 7898852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Cahill AG; Spain J
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 58(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 25811127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal Heart Rate Auscultation, 4th Edition.
    Wisner K; Holschuh C
    Nurs Womens Health; 2024 Apr; 28(2):e1-e39. PubMed ID: 38363259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Sandmire HF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Nov; 82(5):880-1. PubMed ID: 8414344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal Heart Rate Auscultation, 4th Edition.
    Wisner K; Holschuh C
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2024 May; 53(3):e10-e48. PubMed ID: 38363241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis.
    Vintzileos AM; Nochimson DJ; Guzman ER; Knuppel RA; Lake M; Schifrin BS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 85(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 7800313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
    Graham EM; Petersen SM; Christo DK; Fox HE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66. PubMed ID: 16946228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future.
    Stout MJ; Cahill AG
    Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):127-42, vii. PubMed ID: 21353094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal Heart Rate Auscultation, 3rd edition.
    Wisner K; Holschuh C
    Nurs Womens Health; 2018 Dec; 22(6):e1-e32. PubMed ID: 30501909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auscultation of the fetal heart presents advantages over electronic monitoring.
    Sandmire HF; DeMott RK
    Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):661-3. PubMed ID: 8571614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ACOG Practice Bulletin. No. 62: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):1161-9. PubMed ID: 15863569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart rate during labor: an opportunity for shared decision making.
    Hersh S; Megregian M; Emeis C
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(3):344-9. PubMed ID: 24758413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized trial of electronic fetal monitoring in preterm labor.
    Luthy DA; Shy KK; van Belle G; Larson EB; Hughes JP; Benedetti TJ; Brown ZA; Effer S; King JF; Stenchever MA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 3554055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recommendations for intrapartum fetal monitoring are not followed in low-risk women: A study from two Norwegian birth units.
    Rosset IK; Lindahl K; Blix E; Kaasen A
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2020 Dec; 26():100552. PubMed ID: 33038758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cardiotocography and ST analysis for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Leipälä J; Ojala K; Stefanovic V; Mäkelä M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Apr; 91(4):518; author reply 519. PubMed ID: 22007795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Use of Intermittent Auscultation in Parturients of Varying BMI Categories: Experience From a Mid-Sized Tertiary Care Obstetrical Unit.
    Thakkar SS; Lammers S; Hahn PM; Waddington A
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Apr; 37(4):310-313. PubMed ID: 26001683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of International Guidelines For the Application of Cardiotocography].
    Schulten PS; Suppelna JP; Dagres T; Noè G; Anapolski M; Reinhard J; Krentel H; Tempfer C; Schiermeier S
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2018 Apr; 222(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 29475210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re: Admission cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart in low-risk pregnancy during evaluation for possible labour admission-a multicentre randomised trial: the ADCAR trial: Is admission cardiotocography effective? The result of a randomized controlled trial.
    Lindqvist PG; Biasoletto G
    BJOG; 2019 Feb; 126(3):428-429. PubMed ID: 30394645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.