448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16828848)
1. Testing of two binary grading systems for FIGO stage III serous carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum.
Seidman JD; Horkayne-Szakaly I; Cosin JA; Ryu HS; Haiba M; Boice CR; Yemelyanova AV
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Nov; 103(2):703-8. PubMed ID: 16828848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinicopathologic analysis and expression of cyclin D1 and p53 of ovarian borderline tumors and carcinomas].
Shao HL; Shen DH; Xue WC; Li Y; Yu YZ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 42(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 17631760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microinvasion links ovarian serous borderline tumor and grade 1 invasive carcinoma.
Hogg R; Scurry J; Kim SN; Friedlander M; Hacker N
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jul; 106(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 17467045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patterns of stromal invasion in ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (borderline tumors): a reevaluation of the concept of stromal microinvasion.
McKenney JK; Balzer BL; Longacre TA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Oct; 30(10):1209-21. PubMed ID: 17001150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subdividing ovarian and peritoneal serous carcinoma into moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated does not have biologic validity based on molecular genetic and in vitro drug resistance data.
Vang R; Shih IeM; Salani R; Sugar E; Ayhan A; Kurman RJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Nov; 32(11):1667-74. PubMed ID: 18769340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tumor cell type can be reproducibly diagnosed and is of independent prognostic significance in patients with maximally debulked ovarian carcinoma.
Gilks CB; Ionescu DN; Kalloger SE; Köbel M; Irving J; Clarke B; Santos J; Le N; Moravan V; Swenerton K;
Hum Pathol; 2008 Aug; 39(8):1239-51. PubMed ID: 18602670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic significance and interobserver variability of histologic grading systems for endometrial carcinoma.
Scholten AN; Smit VT; Beerman H; van Putten WL; Creutzberg CL
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 14770433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a two-tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma.
Malpica A; Deavers MT; Tornos C; Kurman RJ; Soslow R; Seidman JD; Munsell MF; Gaertner E; Frishberg D; Silva EG
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Aug; 31(8):1168-74. PubMed ID: 17667538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are all pelvic (nonuterine) serous carcinomas of tubal origin?
Przybycin CG; Kurman RJ; Ronnett BM; Shih IeM; Vang R
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Oct; 34(10):1407-16. PubMed ID: 20861711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum.
Schmeler KM; Sun CC; Bodurka DC; Deavers MT; Malpica A; Coleman RL; Ramirez PT; Gershenson DM
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Mar; 108(3):510-4. PubMed ID: 18155273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognosis of stage III or IV primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma.
Dubernard G; Morice P; Rey A; Camatte S; Fourchotte V; Thoury A; Pomel C; Pautier P; Lhommé C; Duvillard P; Castaigne D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Nov; 30(9):976-81. PubMed ID: 15498644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The recurrence and the overall survival rates of ovarian serous borderline neoplasms with noninvasive implants is time dependent.
Silva EG; Gershenson DM; Malpica A; Deavers M
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Nov; 30(11):1367-71. PubMed ID: 17063075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Toward the development of a universal grading system for ovarian epithelial carcinoma. I. Prognostic significance of histopathologic features--problems involved in the architectural grading system.
Shimizu Y; Kamoi S; Amada S; Hasumi K; Akiyama F; Silverberg SG
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Jul; 70(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 9698465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nuclear size distinguishes low- from high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma and predicts outcome.
Hsu CY; Kurman RJ; Vang R; Wang TL; Baak J; Shih IeM
Hum Pathol; 2005 Oct; 36(10):1049-54. PubMed ID: 16226103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ovarian serous borderline tumors with invasive peritoneal implants.
Gershenson DM; Silva EG; Levy L; Burke TW; Wolf JK; Tornos C
Cancer; 1998 Mar; 82(6):1096-103. PubMed ID: 9506355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the clinical behavior of newly diagnosed stages II-IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary with that of serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential that recur as low-grade serous carcinoma.
Shvartsman HS; Sun CC; Bodurka DC; Mahajan V; Crispens M; Lu KH; Deavers MT; Malpica A; Silva EG; Gershenson DM
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 17320156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pathological classification and grading of primary ovarian carcinoma: experience of the ARTAC ovarian study group.
Vacher-Lavenu MC; Le Tourneau A; Duvillard P; Godefroy N; Pinel MC
Bull Cancer; 1993 Feb; 80(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 8173164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma: a review with emphasis on new developments and pathogenesis.
McCluggage WG
Pathology; 2011 Aug; 43(5):420-32. PubMed ID: 21716157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cell proliferation in ovarian carcinoma: superior accuracy of S-phase fraction (SPF) by DNA labeling index versus flow cytometric SPF, lack of independent prognostic power for SPF and DNA ploidy, and limited effect of SPF on tumor growth rate.
Meyer JS; Gersell DJ; Yim S
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Jun; 81(3):466-76. PubMed ID: 11371140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer : 20 years of prospectively collected data from a single center.
Storey DJ; Rush R; Stewart M; Rye T; Al-Nafussi A; Williams AR; Smyth JF; Gabra H
Cancer; 2008 May; 112(10):2211-20. PubMed ID: 18344211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
