275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16829490)
1. Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule.
Starns JJ; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):742-61. PubMed ID: 16829490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The difference between implicit and explicit associative processes at study in creating false memory in the DRM paradigm.
Kawasaki Y; Yama H
Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 16423743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition.
Dodd MD; Sheard ED; MacLeod CM
Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 16423748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosing criterion-level effects on memory: what aspects of memory are enhanced by repeated retrieval?
Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
Psychol Sci; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1127-31. PubMed ID: 21813798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The distinctiveness heuristic in false recognition and false recall.
McCabe DP; Smith AD
Memory; 2006 Jul; 14(5):570-83. PubMed ID: 16754242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the dual effects of repetition on false recognition.
Benjamin AS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jul; 27(4):941-7. PubMed ID: 11486927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the nature of associative information in recognition memory.
Kelley R; Wixted JT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):701-22. PubMed ID: 11394675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of familiarity in item recognition, associative recognition, and plurality recognition on self-paced and speeded tests.
Westerman DL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):723-32. PubMed ID: 11394676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When true memory availability promotes false memory: evidence from confabulating patients.
Ciaramelli E; Ghetti S; Frattarelli M; Làdavas E
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1866-77. PubMed ID: 16580028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. False item recognition in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
Abe N; Fujii T; Nishio Y; Iizuka O; Kanno S; Kikuchi H; Takagi M; Hiraoka K; Yamasaki H; Choi H; Hirayama K; Shinohara M; Mori E
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1897-902. PubMed ID: 21419789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the dynamic nature of response criterion in recognition memory: effects of base rate, awareness, and feedback.
Rhodes MG; Jacoby LL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):305-20. PubMed ID: 17352613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can false memories spontaneously recover?
Seamon JG; Berko JR; Sahlin B; Yu YL; Colker JM; Gottfried DH
Memory; 2006 May; 14(4):415-23. PubMed ID: 16766445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Heightened false memory: a long-term sequela of severe closed head injury.
Ries M; Marks W
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2233-40. PubMed ID: 16814819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Theoretical correlations and measured correlations: relating recognition and recall in four distributed memory models.
Kahana MJ; Rizzuto DS; Schneider AR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):933-53. PubMed ID: 16248743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of associative strength in children's false memory illusions.
Howe ML; Wimmer MC; Blease K
Memory; 2009 Jan; 17(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 19031309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the nature of the decision axis in signal-detection-based models of recognition memory.
Morrell HE; Gaitan S; Wixted JT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1095-110. PubMed ID: 12450335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can intentional forgetting reduce false memory? Effects of list-level and item-level forgetting.
Lee YS
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 17475195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring the activation level of critical lures in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
Hancock TW; Hicks JL; Marsh RL; Ritschel L
Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 12710219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.
Higham PA; Perfect TJ; Bruno D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):57-80. PubMed ID: 19210081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An examination of two-process theories of false recognition.
Arndt J; Gould C
Memory; 2006 Oct; 14(7):814-33. PubMed ID: 16938694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
