These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62. Interpolated task effects on direct and mediated false recognition: effects of initial recall, recognition, and the ironic effect of guessing. Huff MJ; Coane JH; Hutchison KA; Grasser EB; Blais JE J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1720-30. PubMed ID: 22642236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm. Huff MJ; Bodner GE J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The effect of relations in paired-associate learning. Wilton RN Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):214-31. PubMed ID: 16484111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Effects of study list composition on the word frequency effect and metacognitive attributions in recognition memory. Higham PA; Bruno D; Perfect TJ Memory; 2010 Nov; 18(8):883-99. PubMed ID: 21108107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Editing (out) generated study words in a recognition exclusion task: Effects of response signal delay and generation procedure. Jones TC Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):712-29. PubMed ID: 16829488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Changing the criterion for memory conformity in free recall and recognition. Wright DB; Gabbert F; Memon A; London K Memory; 2008 Feb; 16(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 18286418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Criterion setting and the dynamics of recognition memory. Cox GE; Shiffrin RM Top Cogn Sci; 2012 Jan; 4(1):135-50. PubMed ID: 22253186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Relational and item-specific information: trade-off and redundancy. Engelkamp J; Biegelmann U; McDaniel MA Memory; 1998 May; 6(3):307-33. PubMed ID: 9709445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. True and false memory in the absence of perceptual identification. Cleary AM; Greene RL Memory; 2004 Mar; 12(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 15250187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. A dynamic stimulus-driven model of signal detection. Turner BM; Van Zandt T; Brown S Psychol Rev; 2011 Oct; 118(4):583-613. PubMed ID: 21895383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Effects of repetition on age differences in associative recognition. Van Ocker JC; Light LL; Olfman D; Rivera J Memory; 2017 Mar; 25(3):350-359. PubMed ID: 27221786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory. Verde MF; Rotello CM Mem Cognit; 2007 Mar; 35(2):254-62. PubMed ID: 17645166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Test of competing explanations of the bizarre response bias in recognition memory. Worthen JB; Eller LS J Gen Psychol; 2002 Jan; 129(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 12038493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Effects of free and forced retrieval instructions on false recall and recognition. McKelvie SJ J Gen Psychol; 2001 Jul; 128(3):261-78. PubMed ID: 11678358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]