These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16830435)

  • 21. Casey reflections.
    Cavendish EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):305-14. PubMed ID: 16526134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tiptoeing around Roe.
    Meehan M
    Hum Life Rev; 2005; 31(4):44-64. PubMed ID: 16619432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The future of abortion.
    Flynn T
    Free Inq; 1989; 9():44-6. PubMed ID: 16100826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Constitutional persons: an exchange on abortion.
    Schlueter N; Bork RH
    First Things; 2003 Jan; (129):28-36. PubMed ID: 12731559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President.
    Battaglia F
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 110(5):1169; author reply 1170. PubMed ID: 17978133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Abortion in 1938 and today: plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.
    Bourne RW
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2003; 12(2):225-75. PubMed ID: 16493843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The post-Webster press.
    Cowden-Guido R
    Natl Rev; 1990 Nov; 42(22):36, 38-39. PubMed ID: 11656043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Jon O. Newman and the abortion decisions: a remarkable first year.
    Hurwitz AD
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 2002-2003; 46(1-2):231-47. PubMed ID: 16493839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Congressional control of federal court jurisdiction: the case study of abortion.
    Greenwood JS
    S C Law Rev; 2003; 54(4):1069-112. PubMed ID: 16493841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
    Gordon A
    Harvard J Legis; 2004; 41(2):501-15. PubMed ID: 16596750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The vanishing middle in abortion politics.
    Kelly JR
    Christ Century; 1988 Aug; 105(23):708-11. PubMed ID: 11659102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Partial-truth abortion bans.
    Kaminer W
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):17-8. PubMed ID: 16830438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Roe revisited: a grim fairy tale.
    Roden GJ
    Hum Life Rev; 2004; 30(2):49-57. PubMed ID: 15540376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Big abortion: what the antiabortion movement can learn from big tobacco.
    Heminger JD
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2005; 54(4):1273-311. PubMed ID: 17115504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An inside look at partial birth abortion.
    Lowe LR
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998-1999; 24():327-57. PubMed ID: 16180289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The paradox of judicial bypass proceedings.
    Raskin JB
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):281-5. PubMed ID: 16526132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. RU 486 examined: impact of a new technology on an old controversy.
    Prothro G
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1997; 30(4):715-41. PubMed ID: 16514778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President.
    Darney PD; Rosenfield A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):226-7. PubMed ID: 17666593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A ceasefire in the culture war.
    Miller L
    Newsweek; 2009 Apr; 153(14):45. PubMed ID: 19655513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.