These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16830438)

  • 1. Partial-truth abortion bans.
    Kaminer W
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):17-8. PubMed ID: 16830438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. So-called "partial birth abortion" bans: bad medicine? Maybe. Bad law? Definitely!
    Massie AM
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1998; 59(2):301-80. PubMed ID: 11902179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The vagueness of partial-birth abortion bans: deconstruction or destruction?
    Rurka ML
    J Crim Law Criminol; 1999; 89(4):1233-68. PubMed ID: 14628850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Legal failure or moral success? An evaluation of the ban on partial-birth abortion.
    Kolenc AB
    America (NY); 2004 Nov; 191(17):11-4. PubMed ID: 15675070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
    Joersz M
    N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brief supports partial-birth abortion ban.
    Catholic Church. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops [USCCB]
    Origins; 2006 Jun; 36(4):58-63. PubMed ID: 16832962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stenberg v. Carhart: have the states lost their power to regulate abortion?
    Gauthier AM
    New Engl Law Rev; 2002; 36(3):625-68. PubMed ID: 15212038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Justices to review federal ban on disputed abortion method; case may hinge on Alito, Court's newest member.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 16514736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Banning partial-birth abortions: a few inches away from testing post-viability jurisprudence.
    Flanagan PP
    Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):141-77. PubMed ID: 16514753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
    Gordon A
    Harvard J Legis; 2004; 41(2):501-15. PubMed ID: 16596750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute.
    Gough AD
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):187-214. PubMed ID: 12774818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Partial-birth abortion: the final frontier of abortion jurisprudence.
    Bopp J; Cook CR
    Issues Law Med; 1998; 14(1):3-57. PubMed ID: 9707939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. State's partial-birth abortion ban supported.
    Chopko M; Moses M
    Origins; 2000 Mar; 29(38):617-23. PubMed ID: 11913443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Partial birth" abortion and the health exception: protecting maternal health or risking abortion on demand?
    Glidewell G
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2001 Apr; 28(4):1089-150. PubMed ID: 12680381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Candor and the court: the Supreme Court will confront as never before the violent nature of mid- and later-term abortion.
    Stith R
    America (NY); 2000 Apr; 182(11):13-5. PubMed ID: 11913437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. X marks the spot while Casey strikes out: two controversial abortion decisions.
    Zenkich S
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(3):1001-40. PubMed ID: 16437786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stenberg v. Carhart: women retain their right to choose.
    Berkowitz JF
    J Crim Law Criminol; 2001; 91(2):337-83. PubMed ID: 12774791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development of the undue burden standard in Stenberg v. Carhart: will proposed RU-486 legislation survive?
    Guenther H
    Indiana Law Rev; 2002; 35(3):1021-44. PubMed ID: 16211757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. U.S. Court in New York rejects partial-birth abortion ban.
    Preston J
    N Y Times Web; 2004 Aug; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15540363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Appeals court voids ban on 'partial birth' abortions: U.S. law most likely headed to justices.
    Preston J
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Jul; ():A11. PubMed ID: 16060016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.