BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16830522)

  • 1. Unknown mechainism for airborne mercury.
    Lubick N
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jun; 40(12):3664-5. PubMed ID: 16830522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The thief process for mercury removal from flue gas.
    Granite EJ; Freeman MC; Hargis RA; O'Dowd WJ; Pennline HW
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 84(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 16959396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mercury speciation and emissions from coal combustion in Guiyang, Southwest China.
    Tang S; Feng X; Qiu J; Yin G; Yang Z
    Environ Res; 2007 Oct; 105(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 17517388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mercury control costs drop.
    Cooney CM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Feb; 41(4):1061-2. PubMed ID: 17593698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adsorbents for capturing mercury in coal-fired boiler flue gas.
    Yang H; Xu Z; Fan M; Bland AE; Judkins RR
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jul; 146(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 17544578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transformation of mercury speciation through the SCR system in power plants.
    Yang HM; Pan WP
    J Environ Sci (China); 2007; 19(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 17915726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduced mercury deposition in New Hampshire from 1996 to 2002 due to changes in local sources.
    Han YJ; Holsen TM; Evers DC; Driscoll CT
    Environ Pollut; 2008 Dec; 156(3):1348-56. PubMed ID: 18430499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of ammonia on mercury leaching from coal fly ash.
    Wang J; Wang T; Mallhi H; Liu Y; Ban H; Ladwig K
    Chemosphere; 2007 Nov; 69(10):1586-92. PubMed ID: 17604819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The simultaneous capture of mercury and fine particles by hybrid filter with powder activated carbon injection.
    Jang HN; Back SK; Sung JH; Kang YS; Jurng J; Seo YC
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Jun; 237():531-540. PubMed ID: 29524875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mercury emissions from geothermal power plants.
    Robertson DE; Crecelius EA; Fruchter JS; Ludwick JD
    Science; 1977 Jun; 196(4294):1094-7. PubMed ID: 860131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controversial results downplay power plant mercury emissions.
    Renner R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Dec; 38(23):450A. PubMed ID: 15597865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal and spatial distributions of total gaseous mercury concentrations in ambient air in a mountainous area in southwestern China: implications for industrial and domestic mercury emissions in remote areas in China.
    Fu X; Feng X; Wang S; Rothenberg S; Shang L; Li Z; Qiu G
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Mar; 407(7):2306-14. PubMed ID: 19138788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comments regarding 'On the escaping radioactivity from coal power plants'.
    Doganis S
    Health Phys; 1985 Dec; 49(6):1310-1. PubMed ID: 4077538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toxic air pollutants. Inspector general blasts EPA mercury analysis.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2005 Feb; 307(5711):829-31. PubMed ID: 15705816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mercury emissions from coal combustion: modeling and comparison of Hg capture in a fabric filter versus an electrostatic precipitator.
    Scala F; Clack HL
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Apr; 152(2):616-23. PubMed ID: 17703878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiological risks: coal vs nuclear.
    Hickman DP
    Health Phys; 1984 Nov; 47(5):792-4. PubMed ID: 6511423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Energy, environment, and health: what can we learn from the nuclear experience? Fourteenth Failla memorial lecture.
    Richmond CR
    Radiat Res; 1978 Mar; 73(3):395-419. PubMed ID: 635115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. After the clean air mercury rule: prospects for reducing mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants.
    Milford JB; Pienciak A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Apr; 43(8):2669-73. PubMed ID: 19475932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dramatically improved mercury removal.
    Betts K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Aug; 37(15):283A-284A. PubMed ID: 12966960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduction of mercury emissions from anthropogenic sources including coal combustion.
    Li Z; Chen B; Li Y; Le XC
    J Environ Sci (China); 2021 Feb; 100():363-368. PubMed ID: 33279051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.