346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16831187)
1. Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations.
Gordan VV; Shen C; Riley J; Mjör IA
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(3):144-53; discussion 154. PubMed ID: 16831187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 2-year clinical evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations.
Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mjör IA
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):418-25. PubMed ID: 16924981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial.
Moncada G; Fernández E; Martín J; Arancibia C; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 18505215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material.
Gordan VV; Shen C; Watson RE; Mjor IA
Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial.
Moncada GC; Martin J; Fernandez E; Vildosola PG; Caamano C; Caro MJ; Mjor IA; Gordan VV
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(5):314-8. PubMed ID: 17004564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions.
Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Gregory PN; Owens BM
Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial.
Popoff DA; Santa Rosa TT; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Mjör IA
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-10. PubMed ID: 22616930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimal invasive treatment for defective restorations: five-year results using sealants.
Martin J; Fernandez E; Estay J; Gordan VV; Mjor IA; Moncada G
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 22788726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results.
Demirci M; Ersev H; Uçok M
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 12022451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
Pollington S; van Noort R
Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in Class II cavities: clinical results and margin analysis after four years.
Krämer N; Reinelt C; Richter G; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2009 Jun; 25(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 19237189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: a 7-year report.
Türkün LS; Aktener BO; Ateş M
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jun; 34(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 12859086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-year performance of glass-ceramic insert-resin composite restorations: clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation.
Kiremitçi A; Bolay S; Gürgan S
Quintessence Int; 1998 Jul; 29(7):417-21. PubMed ID: 9759057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Palma-Dibb RG
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up.
Fernández EM; Martin JA; Angel PA; Mjör IA; Gordan VV; Moncada GA
Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 21537587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Restoring cervical lesions with flexible composites.
Peumans M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt KL; Kanumilli P; Yoshida Y; Inoue S; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
Dent Mater; 2007 Jun; 23(6):749-54. PubMed ID: 16949661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sealing, refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class II defective restorations: a three-year clinical trial.
Moncada G; Martin J; Fernández E; Hempel MC; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Apr; 140(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 19339531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for a period of 3 years.
Türkün LS; Türkün M; Ozata F
Quintessence Int; 2005 May; 36(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 15892534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
