These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16832918)
1. Alternatives to local institutional review board (IRB) system debated. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2006 Apr; 21(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 16832918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Case study: agency says institutional review board (IRB) did not fulfill duties so agency investigation expands. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2006 Apr; 21(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 16832919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The need to understand IRB deliberations. Candilis PJ; Lidz CW; Arnold RM IRB; 2006; 28(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16680872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical research oversight from the corporate governance perspective: comparing institutional review boards and corporate boards. Saver RS William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Nov; 46(2):619-730. PubMed ID: 17167924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. SACHRP recommendations for review of children's research requiring DHHS secretary's approval. Fisher CB; Kornetsky SZ IRB; 2005; 27(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 16021795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cooperative research ethics review boards: a win-win solution? Koski G; Aungst J; Kupersmith J; Getz K; Rimoin D IRB; 2005; 27(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 16021793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New guidance on reviews by central institutional review boards (IRBs). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2005 May; 20(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 16175714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Research, ethics committees and legal issues. Moore A N Z Bioeth J; 2003 Oct; 4(3):8-15. PubMed ID: 15597476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Continued concern: human subject protection, the institutional review board, and continuing review. Hoffman S Tenn Law Rev; 2001; 68(4):725-70. PubMed ID: 16189912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reducing the burden on many institutional review boards. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 15119341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New Zealand's ethics committees. Moore A N Z Bioeth J; 2004 Jun; 5(2):3. PubMed ID: 15597495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reforming the oversight of multi-site clinical research: a review of two possible solutions. Nowak KS; Bankert EA; Nelson RM Account Res; 2006; 13(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 16770857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recurrent issues in the review of medical research on human subjects. Moore DL Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():1-33. PubMed ID: 16296123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethics review of multi-centre clinical trials in Canada. Enzle ME; Schmaltz R Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):51-7. PubMed ID: 16459414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Case study: research subject says institutional review board (IRB) would not answer her questions. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2006 Feb; 21(2):7. PubMed ID: 16789309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. IRB triage of projects that involve medical record review. Amdur R; Speers MA; Bankert E IRB; 2000 Jan; 22(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 12546009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Case study: institutional review board (IRB) did not know about subject problem until after study. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2006 May; 21(5):6-7. PubMed ID: 16832916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]