These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16832919)

  • 1. Case study: agency says institutional review board (IRB) did not fulfill duties so agency investigation expands.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Apr; 21(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 16832919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Case study: institutional review board (IRB) did not know about subject problem until after study.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 May; 21(5):6-7. PubMed ID: 16832916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Case study: agency says institutional review board (IRB) failed to warn subjects of significant problems.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Mar; 21(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 16789303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Case study: research subject says institutional review board (IRB) would not answer her questions.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Feb; 21(2):7. PubMed ID: 16789309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Case study: research subject says institutional review board (IRB) was no help.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Jan; 21(1):7. PubMed ID: 16789306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research subject complains about how she was treated by an institutional review board (IRB).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Dec; 20(12):7. PubMed ID: 16607709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How institutional review boards (IRBs) can handle adverse event reports.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Jan; 21(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 16789305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New guidance on when and how to report human research problems.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 16270442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continued concern: human subject protection, the institutional review board, and continuing review.
    Hoffman S
    Tenn Law Rev; 2001; 68(4):725-70. PubMed ID: 16189912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concept paper: a virtual centralized IRB system.
    McWilliams R; Hebden CW; Gilpin AM
    Account Res; 2006; 13(1):25-45. PubMed ID: 16770858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New federal guidance adds duties for institutional review boards (IRBs).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Nov; 20(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 16358479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recurrent issues in the review of medical research on human subjects.
    Moore DL
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():1-33. PubMed ID: 16296123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternatives to local institutional review board (IRB) system debated.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Apr; 21(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 16832918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. IRBs, human subjects, and reporting adverse events.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Nov; 20(11):3. PubMed ID: 16358480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Institutional review boards (IRBs) and working with adverse event reports.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Dec; 20(12):1-3. PubMed ID: 16607708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Case study: university finally can resume human subjects research again.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Aug; 21(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 17058815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spate of suspensions of academic research spurs questions about federal strategy: a U.S. agency, its own future uncertain, unsettles college officials with its crackdown.
    Brainard J
    Chron High Educ; 2000 Feb; 96(22):A29-30, A32. PubMed ID: 15744907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When a research subject calls with a complaint, what will the institutional review board do?
    Motil KJ; Allen J; Taylor A
    IRB; 2004; 26(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 15281212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SACHRP recommendations for review of children's research requiring DHHS secretary's approval.
    Fisher CB; Kornetsky SZ
    IRB; 2005; 27(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 16021795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.