These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1683373)

  • 1. Effect of different sharpening stones on periodontal curettes evaluated by scanning electron microscopy.
    Huang CC; Tseng CC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1991 Aug; 90(8):782-7. PubMed ID: 1683373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sharpening of periodontal instruments with different sharpening stones and its influence upon root debridement--scanning electronic microscopy assessment.
    Silva MV; Gomes DA; Leite FR; Sampaio JE; de Toledo BE; Mendes AJ
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 8(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16459885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scanning electron microscope assessment of several resharpening techniques on the cutting edges of Gracey curettes.
    Andrade Acevedo RA; Cézar Sampaio JE; Shibli JA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov; 8(7):70-7. PubMed ID: 17994157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of wear of dental curettes during standardized root planing.
    Tal H; Panno JM; Vaidyanathan TK
    J Periodontol; 1985 Sep; 56(9):532-6. PubMed ID: 3897505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of three different manual techniques of sharpening curettes through a scanning electron microscope: a randomized controlled experimental study.
    Di Fiore A; Mazzoleni S; Fantin F; Favero L; De Francesco M; Stellini E
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 25382386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of two methods of resharpening periodontal curets: a comparative study.
    Moses O; Tal H; Artzi Z; Sperling A; Zohar R; Nemcovsky CE
    J Periodontol; 2003 Jul; 74(7):1032-7. PubMed ID: 12931766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of curette sharpness.
    Hoffman LA; Gross KB; Cobb CM; Pippin DJ; Tira DE; Overman PR
    J Dent Hyg; 1989 Oct; 63(8):382-7. PubMed ID: 2630619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scanning electron microscopic and profilometric study of different sharpening stones.
    Andrade Acevedo RA; Cardozo AK; Sampaio JE
    Braz Dent J; 2006; 17(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 17262132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A scanning electron microscope study comparing the effectiveness of different types of sharpening stones and curets.
    Rossi R; Smukler H
    J Periodontol; 1995 Nov; 66(11):956-61. PubMed ID: 8558396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparison of Efficiency and Material Wear of Diamond-Plated versus Ceramic Sharpening Stones.
    Hessheimer HM; Payne JB; Shaw LE; Spanyers EM; Beatty MW
    J Dent Hyg; 2017 Oct; 91(5):64-67. PubMed ID: 29118281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of wear of stainless steel and high carbon steel curettes.
    Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Green E; Gabbay M
    J Periodontol; 1989 Jun; 60(6):320-4. PubMed ID: 2674396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study.
    Solís Moreno C; Santos A; Nart J; Levi P; Velásquez A; Sanz Moliner J
    J Periodontal Res; 2012 Oct; 47(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 22494068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Root surface removal and resultant surface texture with diamond-coated ultrasonic inserts: an in vitro and SEM study.
    Vastardis S; Yukna RA; Rice DA; Mercante D
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 15842261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing significance of sharpening brand-new scaler.
    Matsui K; Onaka K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2013; 54(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 23614947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative effectiveness of hand and ultrasonic instrumentations in root surface planing in vitro.
    Khosravi M; Bahrami ZS; Atabaki MS; Shokrgozar MA; Shokri F
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 15016018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wear and fracture of curettes due to sharpening and scaling processes.
    Liu G; Liu X; Li N; Gao C; Cui T; Luan Q; Wang J
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2022 Aug; 20(3):564-570. PubMed ID: 34954886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Molar furcation entrance and its relation to the width of curette blades used in periodontal mechanical therapy.
    dos Santos KM; Pinto SC; Pochapski MT; Wambier DS; Pilatti GL; Santos FA
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2009 Nov; 7(4):263-9. PubMed ID: 19832913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the effects of periodontal rotary instruments and Gracey curettes on root surface characteristics: an in vivo SEM study.
    Dwivedi S; Verma SJ
    Quintessence Int; 2012; 43(10):e135-40. PubMed ID: 23115772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Scaler sharpening. Effect of the cutting edge of scaler and the epoxy resin surface with several types of sharpening stones and strokes].
    Otogoto J
    Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi; 1989 Jun; 31(2):583-92. PubMed ID: 2700198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effectiveness of scaling and root planing with curets designed for deep pockets.
    Nagy RJ; Otomo-Corgel J; Stambaugh R
    J Periodontol; 1992 Dec; 63(12):954-9. PubMed ID: 1474467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.