388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16834841)
1. Cost-effectiveness of alternative treatments for women with osteoporosis in Canada.
Goeree R; Blackhouse G; Adachi J
Curr Med Res Opin; 2006 Jul; 22(7):1425-36. PubMed ID: 16834841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health-economic comparison of three recommended drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis.
Brecht JG; Kruse HP; Möhrke W; Oestreich A; Huppertz E
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res; 2004; 24(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15575171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Stevenson M; Jones ML; De Nigris E; Brewer N; Davis S; Oakley J
Health Technol Assess; 2005 Jun; 9(22):1-160. PubMed ID: 15929857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence to inform decision makers in Thailand: a cost-effectiveness analysis of screening and treatment strategies for postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Kingkaew P; Maleewong U; Ngarmukos C; Teerawattananon Y
Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S20-8. PubMed ID: 22265062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost effectiveness of denosumab versus oral bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis in the US.
Parthan A; Kruse M; Yurgin N; Huang J; Viswanathan HN; Taylor D
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Oct; 11(5):485-97. PubMed ID: 23868102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Canada.
Chau D; Becker DL; Coombes ME; Ioannidis G; Adachi JD; Goeree R
J Med Econ; 2012; 15 Suppl 1():3-14. PubMed ID: 23035625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate versus risedronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged over 75 years.
Hiligsmann M; Bruyère O; Reginster JY
Bone; 2010 Feb; 46(2):440-6. PubMed ID: 19716940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis screening and treatment with hormone replacement therapy, raloxifene, or alendronate.
Mobley LR; Hoerger TJ; Wittenborn JS; Galuska DA; Rao JK
Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(2):194-206. PubMed ID: 16525173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of fewer hip fractures with risedronate versus alendronate in the first year of treatment: modeled German cost-effectiveness analysis.
Thompson M; Pasquale M; Grima D; Moehrke W; Kruse HP
Value Health; 2010; 13(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 19883401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The cost-effectiveness of therapy with teriparatide and alendronate in women with severe osteoporosis.
Liu H; Michaud K; Nayak S; Karpf DB; Owens DK; Garber AM
Arch Intern Med; 2006 Jun; 166(11):1209-17. PubMed ID: 16772249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Universal bone densitometry screening combined with alendronate therapy for those diagnosed with osteoporosis is highly cost-effective for elderly women.
Schousboe JT; Ensrud KE; Nyman JA; Melton LJ; Kane RL
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2005 Oct; 53(10):1697-704. PubMed ID: 16181168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cost effectiveness analysis of calcium and vitamin D supplementation, etidronate, and alendronate in the prevention of vertebral fractures in women treated with glucocorticoids.
Buckley LM; Hillner BE
J Rheumatol; 2003 Jan; 30(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 12508402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness and cost utility of risedronate for osteoporosis treatment and fracture prevention in women: a Swiss perspective.
Wasserfallen JB; Krieg MA; Greiner RA; Lamy O
J Med Econ; 2008; 11(3):499-523. PubMed ID: 19450101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of osteoporosis treatment with risedronate.
Brecht JG; Kruse HP; Felsenberg D; Möhrke W; Oestreich A; Huppertz E
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res; 2003; 23(4):93-105. PubMed ID: 15224498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy and safety of alendronate and risedronate for postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Iwamoto J; Takeda T; Sato Y
Curr Med Res Opin; 2006 May; 22(5):919-28. PubMed ID: 16709313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Commentary on Mobley and Others: importance of assumptions about VTE mortality in modeling the cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis therapies.
Meadows ES; Stock J; Johnston JA
Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(6):633-5; author reply 636-7. PubMed ID: 17099202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of preventative therapies for postmenopausal women with osteopenia.
Meadows ES; Klein R; Rousculp MD; Smolen L; Ohsfeldt RL; Johnston JA
BMC Womens Health; 2007 Apr; 7():6. PubMed ID: 17439652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost effectiveness of alendronate for the treatment of male osteoporosis in Sweden.
Borgström F; Johnell O; Jönsson B; Zethraeus N; Sen SS
Bone; 2004 Jun; 34(6):1064-71. PubMed ID: 15193554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determinants of persistence with bisphosphonates: a study in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Penning-van Beest FJ; Goettsch WG; Erkens JA; Herings RM
Clin Ther; 2006 Feb; 28(2):236-42. PubMed ID: 16678644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Greater first year effectiveness drives favorable cost-effectiveness of brand risedronate versus generic or brand alendronate: modeled Canadian analysis.
Grima DT; Papaioannou A; Thompson MF; Pasquale MK; Adachi JD
Osteoporos Int; 2008 May; 19(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 18008100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
