504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16836709)
1. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.
Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimization of atrial defibrillation with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 15(7):790-4. PubMed ID: 15250864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with single- or dual-coil defibrillation leads and active can.
Lubiński A; Lewicka-Nowak E; Zienciuk A; Królak T; Kempa M; Pazdyga A; Raczak G; Swiatecka G
Kardiol Pol; 2005 Sep; 63(3):234-41; discussion 242-3. PubMed ID: 16180177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Estimation of defibrillation threshold using abdominally implanted cardioverter-defibrillator with an additional defibrillation pole in a dual-coil lead endocardial defibrillation system].
Pazdyga A; Lubiński A; Lewicka-Nowak E; Królak T; Kempa M; Zienciuk A; Raczak G
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2007 Feb; 22(128):86-9. PubMed ID: 17598649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual-coil vs single-coil active pectoral implantable defibrillator lead systems: defibrillation energy requirements and probability of defibrillation success at multiples of the defibrillation energy requirements.
Schulte B; Sperzel J; Carlsson J; Schwarz T; Ehrlich W; Pitschner HF; Neuzner J
Europace; 2001 Jul; 3(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 11467457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Achieving sufficient safety margins with fixed duration waveforms and the use of multiple time constants.
Keane D; Aweh N; Hynes B; Sheahan RG; Cripps T; Bashir Y; Zaidi A; Fahy G; Lowe M; Doherty P; Kroll MK
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 May; 30(5):596-602. PubMed ID: 17461867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal electrode position for transvenous defibrillation: a prospective randomized study.
Stajduhar KC; Ott GY; Kron J; McAnulty JH; Oliver RP; Reynolds BT; Adler SW; Halperin BD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 8522716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of transvenous coil position for active can defibrillation thresholds.
Gold MR; Olsovsky MR; DeGroot PJ; Cuello C; Shorofsky SR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Jan; 11(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 10695457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective, randomized comparison in humans of a unipolar defibrillation system with that using an additional superior vena cava electrode.
Bardy GH; Dolack GL; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Mehra R; Johnson G
Circulation; 1994 Mar; 89(3):1090-3. PubMed ID: 8124794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoperative comparison of a subthreshold test pulse with the standard high-energy shock approach for the measurement of defibrillation lead impedance.
Schuchert A; Winter J; Binner L; Kühl M; Meinertz T;
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jan; 17(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 16426402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical predictors of atrial defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Brown T; Peters RW; Gold MR
Heart Rhythm; 2005 Jan; 2(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 15851265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distal right ventricular coil position reduces defibrillation thresholds.
Rashba EJ; Bonner M; Wilson J; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Oct; 14(10):1036-40. PubMed ID: 14521655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective, randomized, comparison in patients between a pectoral unipolar defibrillation system and that using an additional inferior vena cava electrode.
Favale S; Dicandia CD; Tunzi P; Rizzon P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1140-5. PubMed ID: 10461288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Management of high defibrillation threshold.
Uyguanco ER; Berger A; Budzikowski AS; Gunsburg M; Kassotis J
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2008 Oct; 6(9):1237-48. PubMed ID: 18939911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Examination of a middle cardiac vein defibrillation coil as stand-alone anode, auxiliary anode, and bystander electrode in a transvenous defibrillation circuit.
Paisey JR; Yue AM; Bessoule F; Allen S; Roberts PR; Morgan JM
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Aug; 27(8):1089-93. PubMed ID: 15305957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lack of benefit of an active pectoral pulse generator on atrial defibrillation thresholds.
Gold MR; Shorofsky SR; Bouhouch R; Joy RA; Kirby DS; Osman AF; Rashba EJ
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Apr; 13(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 12033348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Transvenous subcutaneous implantation technique of the cardioverter/defibrillator].
Block M; Hammel D; Borggrefe M; Scheld HH; Breithardt G
Herz; 1994 Oct; 19(5):259-77. PubMed ID: 8001899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term changes in high-voltage impedance of defibrillating leads.
Val-Mejias JE; Janet DR; Ramadas S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Mar; 32 Suppl 1():S151-4. PubMed ID: 19250081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of biventricular and conventional transvenous defibrillation: a computational study using patient derived models.
Mocanu D; Kettenbach J; Sweeney MO; Kikinis R; Kenknight BH; Eisenberg SR
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 May; 27(5):586-93. PubMed ID: 15125713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Coronary sinus electrode does not reduce atrial defibrillation thresholds.
Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Scheiner A; Peters RW; Ma C; Gold MR
Heart Rhythm; 2006 Jun; 3(6):647-52. PubMed ID: 16731464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
