These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16838128)

  • 1. Non-invasive determination of zero-pressure geometry of arterial aneurysms.
    Raghavan ML; Ma B; Fillinger MF
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 34(9):1414-9. PubMed ID: 16838128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inverse elastostatic stress analysis in pre-deformed biological structures: Demonstration using abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Lu J; Zhou X; Raghavan ML
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(3):693-6. PubMed ID: 16542663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A pull-back algorithm to determine the unloaded vascular geometry in anisotropic hyperelastic AAA passive mechanics.
    Riveros F; Chandra S; Finol EA; Gasser TC; Rodriguez JF
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2013 Apr; 41(4):694-708. PubMed ID: 23192266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A patient-specific computational model of fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Wolters BJ; Rutten MC; Schurink GW; Kose U; de Hart J; van de Vosse FN
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Dec; 27(10):871-83. PubMed ID: 16157501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Importance of initial stress for abdominal aortic aneurysm wall motion: dynamic MRI validated finite element analysis.
    Merkx MA; van 't Veer M; Speelman L; Breeuwer M; Buth J; van de Vosse FN
    J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2369-73. PubMed ID: 19665127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wall stress and flow dynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms: finite element analysis vs. fluid-structure interaction.
    Scotti CM; Jimenez J; Muluk SC; Finol EA
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2008 Jun; 11(3):301-22. PubMed ID: 18568827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stereoscopically observed deformations of a compliant abdominal aortic aneurysm model.
    Meyer CA; Bertrand E; Boiron O; Deplano V
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Nov; 133(11):111004. PubMed ID: 22168736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of diameter, asymmetry, and material anisotropy.
    Rodríguez JF; Ruiz C; Doblaré M; Holzapfel GA
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021023. PubMed ID: 18412510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of abdominal aortic aneurysms: image-based wall thickness distribution.
    Martufi G; Di Martino ES; Amon CH; Muluk SC; Finol EA
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Jun; 131(6):061015. PubMed ID: 19449969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Speelman L; Bohra A; Bosboom EM; Schurink GW; van de Vosse FN; Makaorun MS; Vorp DA
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 17227104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of blood flow and vessel geometry on wall stress and rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Li Z; Kleinstreuer C
    J Med Eng Technol; 2006; 30(5):283-97. PubMed ID: 16980283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolving mechanical properties of a model of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Watton PN; Hill NA
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2009 Feb; 8(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 18058143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A modular inverse elastostatics approach to resolve the pressure-induced stress state for in vivo imaging based cardiovascular modeling.
    Peirlinck M; De Beule M; Segers P; Rebelo N
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Sep; 85():124-133. PubMed ID: 29886406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of the photoelastic method and finite element analysis in the assessment of wall strain in abdominal aortic aneurysm models.
    Doyle BJ; Killion J; Callanan A
    J Biomech; 2012 Jun; 45(10):1759-68. PubMed ID: 22633540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model.
    Rissland P; Alemu Y; Einav S; Ricotta J; Bluestein D
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Mar; 131(3):031001. PubMed ID: 19154060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonlinear anisotropic stress analysis of anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysms.
    Ma B; Lu J; Harbaugh RE; Raghavan ML
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 17227102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards a noninvasive method for determination of patient-specific wall strength distribution in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Vande Geest JP; Wang DH; Wisniewski SR; Makaroun MS; Vorp DA
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 34(7):1098-106. PubMed ID: 16786395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Initial stress and nonlinear material behavior in patient-specific AAA wall stress analysis.
    Speelman L; Bosboom EM; Schurink GW; Buth J; Breeuwer M; Jacobs MJ; van de Vosse FN
    J Biomech; 2009 Aug; 42(11):1713-9. PubMed ID: 19447391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm wall stress analysis using patient-specific finite element modeling of in vivo magnetic resonance imaging.
    Krishnan K; Ge L; Haraldsson H; Hope MD; Saloner DA; Guccione JM; Tseng EE
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Oct; 21(4):471-80. PubMed ID: 26180089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Importance of material model in wall stress prediction in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Polzer S; Gasser TC; Bursa J; Staffa R; Vlachovsky R; Man V; Skacel P
    Med Eng Phys; 2013 Sep; 35(9):1282-9. PubMed ID: 23434615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.