494 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16838532)
1. Hybrid measurement of auditory steady-state responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions using an amplitude-modulated primary tone.
Oswald JA; Rosner T; Janssen T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3886-95. PubMed ID: 16838532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
Hoth S
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
Abdala C
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: its dependence on age and hearing threshold and clinical implications.
Wagner W; Plinkert PK; Vonthein R; Plontke SK
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 265(10):1165-72. PubMed ID: 18301908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hearing threshold estimation using concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady-state responses.
Rosner T; Kandzia F; Oswald JA; Janssen T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):840-51. PubMed ID: 21361442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-source interference as the major reason for auditory-threshold estimation error based on DPOAE input-output functions in normal-hearing subjects.
Dalhoff E; Turcanu D; Vetešník A; Gummer AW
Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():67-82. PubMed ID: 23268357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady state evoked potentials.
Purcell DW; John MS; Picton TW
Hear Res; 2003 Feb; 176(1-2):128-41. PubMed ID: 12583888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
Moulin A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2.
Sutton LA; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK; Whitehead ML
Hear Res; 1994 May; 75(1-2):161-74. PubMed ID: 8071143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram.
Moulin A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1460-70. PubMed ID: 10738801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extraction of sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions by onset-decomposition.
Vetesník A; Turcanu D; Dalhoff E; Gummer AW
Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):21-38. PubMed ID: 19523509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
Lai J; Bartlett EL
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-frequency hearing influences lower-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Arnold DJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Feb; 125(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 10037289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
Abel C; Kössl M
J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
