These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16838546)

  • 1. Speech perception based on spectral peaks versus spectral shape.
    Hillenbrand JM; Houde RA; Gayvert RT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):4041-54. PubMed ID: 16838546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-channel amplitude sweeps are crucial to speech intelligibility.
    Prendergast G; Green GG
    Brain Lang; 2012 Mar; 120(3):406-11. PubMed ID: 22137845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. I.
    ter Keurs M; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2872-80. PubMed ID: 1629480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The intelligibility of noise-vocoded speech: spectral information available from across-channel comparison of amplitude envelopes.
    Roberts B; Summers RJ; Bailey PJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 May; 278(1711):1595-600. PubMed ID: 21068039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise.
    Swanepoel R; Oosthuizen DJ; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II.
    ter Keurs M; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Mar; 93(3):1547-52. PubMed ID: 8473608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coding of the speech spectrum in three time-varying sinusoids.
    Remez RE; Rubin PE; Pisoni DB
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():485-9. PubMed ID: 6575670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using speech sounds to test functional spectral resolution in listeners with cochlear implants.
    Winn MB; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1430-42. PubMed ID: 25786954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Absorption of reliable spectral characteristics in auditory perception.
    Kiefte M; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):366-76. PubMed ID: 18177166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spectral and temporal resolutions of information-bearing acoustic changes for understanding vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):844-55. PubMed ID: 25698018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Talker Versus Dialect Effects on Speech Intelligibility: A Symmetrical Study.
    McCloy DR; Wright RA; Souza PE
    Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):371-86. PubMed ID: 26529902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech perception adjusts to stable spectrotemporal properties of the listening environment.
    Stilp CE; Anderson PW; Assgari AA; Ellis GM; Zahorik P
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():168-178. PubMed ID: 27596251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relative contributions of formants to the intelligibility of sine-wave sentences in Mandarin Chinese.
    Han Y; Chen F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):EL495. PubMed ID: 28618801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vocalic correlates of pitch in whispered versus normal speech.
    Heeren WF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3800-10. PubMed ID: 26723334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic richness modulates the neural networks supporting intelligible speech processing.
    Lee YS; Min NE; Wingfield A; Grossman M; Peelle JE
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():108-117. PubMed ID: 26723103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting contrast effects following reliable spectral properties in speech perception.
    Stilp CE; Anderson PW; Winn MB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3466-76. PubMed ID: 26093434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relative importance of spectral tilt in monophthongs and diphthongs.
    Kiefte M; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1395-404. PubMed ID: 15807027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of frequency-shifted vowels.
    Assmann PF; Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3203-12. PubMed ID: 19045804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Talker information influences spectral contrast effects in speech categorization.
    Assgari AA; Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):3023-32. PubMed ID: 26627776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.