These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16838809)

  • 1. Patients generally ignore health care report cards, but low-rated physicians apparently pay attention.
    Hosp Health Netw; 2006 Jun; 80(6):62, 64. PubMed ID: 16838809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do quality report cards make a difference? The New York and Pennsylvania experience with releasing physician-specific outcomes.
    O'Rourke LM
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1993; 5(6):2-11. PubMed ID: 10130698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility of Report Cards for Measuring Anesthesiologist Quality for Cardiac Surgery.
    Glance LG; Hannan EL; Fleisher LA; Eaton MP; Dutton RP; Lustik SJ; Li Y; Dick AW
    Anesth Analg; 2016 May; 122(5):1603-13. PubMed ID: 27101502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ranking hospitals on surgical quality: does risk-adjustment always matter?
    Dimick JB; Birkmeyer JD
    J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Sep; 207(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 18722939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grading the graders: how hospitals in California and New York perceive and interpret their report cards.
    Romano PS; Rainwater JA; Antonius D
    Med Care; 1999 Mar; 37(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 10098573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Achieving and sustaining improved quality: lessons from New York State and cardiac surgery.
    Chassin MR
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2002; 21(4):40-51. PubMed ID: 12117152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Public report cards--cardiac surgery and beyond.
    Steinbrook R
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Nov; 355(18):1847-9. PubMed ID: 17079758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of risk-adjusted bypass surgery stratification models in a community hospital.
    Reed JF; Olenchock SA
    Heart Lung; 2003; 32(6):383-90. PubMed ID: 14652530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of care information makes a difference: an analysis of market share and price changes after publication of the New York State Cardiac Surgery Mortality Reports.
    Mukamel DB; Mushlin AI
    Med Care; 1998 Jul; 36(7):945-54. PubMed ID: 9674613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Data briefing. Information for patients.
    Appleby J
    Health Serv J; 2002 Apr; 112(5802):29. PubMed ID: 12004499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How well do hospital mortality rates reported in the New York State CABG report card predict subsequent hospital performance?
    Glance LG; Dick AW; Mukamel DB; Li Y; Osler TM
    Med Care; 2010 May; 48(5):466-71. PubMed ID: 20351585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality, not volume, determines outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery in a university-based community hospital network.
    Kurlansky PA; Argenziano M; Dunton R; Lancey R; Nast E; Stewart A; Williams T; Zapolanski A; Chang H; Tingley J; Smith CR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Feb; 143(2):287-93. PubMed ID: 22104669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is hospital procedure volume a reliable marker of quality for coronary artery bypass surgery? A comparison of risk and propensity adjusted operative and midterm outcomes.
    Zacharias A; Schwann TA; Riordan CJ; Durham SJ; Shah A; Papadimos TJ; Engoren M; Habib RH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jun; 79(6):1961-9. PubMed ID: 15919292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do hospitals and surgeons with higher coronary artery bypass graft surgery volumes still have lower risk-adjusted mortality rates?
    Hannan EL; Wu C; Ryan TJ; Bennett E; Culliford AT; Gold JP; Hartman A; Isom OW; Jones RH; McNeil B; Rose EA; Subramanian VA
    Circulation; 2003 Aug; 108(7):795-801. PubMed ID: 12885743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Invited commentary.
    Gold JP
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jun; 79(6):1969. PubMed ID: 15919293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Procedure rates and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures in California and New York.
    Carey JS; Danielsen B; Gold JP; Rossiter SJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 129(6):1276-82. PubMed ID: 15942567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of a matching algorithm to evaluate hospital coronary artery bypass grafting performance as an alternative to conventional risk adjustment.
    Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Dick AW
    Med Care; 2007 Apr; 45(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 17496712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bypass results vary by hospital. Checking up on hospitals and surgeons before bypass surgery may pay off.
    Harv Heart Lett; 2009 Feb; 19(6):1. PubMed ID: 19575517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield's coronary services network: a managed care organization's approach to improving the quality of cardiac care for its members.
    Plogman PL; Pine M; Reed DC; Byrwa KJ; Berman JI
    Am J Manag Care; 1998 Dec; 4(12):1679-86. PubMed ID: 10339100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Start spreading the news: a structural estimate of the effects of New York hospital report cards.
    Dranove D; Sfekas A
    J Health Econ; 2008 Sep; 27(5):1201-7. PubMed ID: 18420293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.