These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16839536)

  • 1. Explaining errors in children's questions.
    Rowland CF
    Cognition; 2007 Jul; 104(1):106-34. PubMed ID: 16839536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The incidence of error in young children's Wh-questions.
    Rowland CF; Pine JM; Lieven EV; Theakston AL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 48(2):384-404. PubMed ID: 15989400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: a longitudinal elicitation study. Part 2: the modals and auxiliary DO.
    Rowland CF; Theakston AL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Dec; 52(6):1471-92. PubMed ID: 19951925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: a longitudinal elicitation study. Part 1: auxiliary BE.
    Theakston AL; Rowland CF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Dec; 52(6):1449-70. PubMed ID: 19951924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Usage-based vs. rule-based learning: the acquisition of word order in wh-questions in English and Norwegian.
    Westergaard M
    J Child Lang; 2009 Nov; 36(5):1023-51. PubMed ID: 19272194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech.
    Rowland CF; Pine JM; Lieven EV; Theakston AL
    J Child Lang; 2003 Aug; 30(3):609-35. PubMed ID: 14513470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of the facilitative effects of inverted yes-no questions on the acquisition of auxiliary verbs.
    Fey ME; Loeb DF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 45(1):160-74. PubMed ID: 14748646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The logical syntax of number words: theory, acquisition and processing.
    Musolino J
    Cognition; 2009 Apr; 111(1):24-45. PubMed ID: 19217616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overregularization in language acquisition.
    Marcus GF; Pinker S; Ullman M; Hollander M; Rosen TJ; Xu F
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1992; 57(4):1-182. PubMed ID: 1518508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.
    Chouinard MM
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2007; 72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. PubMed ID: 17394580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subject-auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: 'what children do know'?
    Rowland CF; Pine JM
    J Child Lang; 2000 Feb; 27(1):157-81. PubMed ID: 10740971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Language, mental state vocabulary, and false belief understanding in children with cochlear implants.
    Peters K; Remmel E; Richards D
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2009 Jul; 40(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 19498015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simulating the cross-linguistic pattern of Optional Infinitive errors in children's declaratives and Wh- questions.
    Freudenthal D; Pine JM; Jones G; Gobet F
    Cognition; 2015 Oct; 143():61-76. PubMed ID: 26114904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing different accounts of inversion errors in children's non-subject wh-questions: 'What experimental data can tell us?'.
    Ambridge B; Rowland CF; Theakston AL; Tomasello M
    J Child Lang; 2006 Aug; 33(3):519-57. PubMed ID: 17017278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Explaining quantitative variation in the rate of Optional Infinitive errors across languages: a comparison of MOSAIC and the Variational Learning Model.
    Freudenthal D; Pine J; Gobet F
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):643-69. PubMed ID: 20334719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The intentionality model and language acquisition: engagement, effort, and the essential tension in development.
    Bloom L; Tinker E
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2001; 66(4):i-viii, 1-91. PubMed ID: 11799833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in the onset of tense marking: a growth-curve analysis.
    Hadley PA; Holt JK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 49(5):984-1000. PubMed ID: 17077210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hesitation patterns in third grade children's derived word productions.
    Edrington JL; Buder EH; Jarmulowicz L
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2009 May; 23(5):348-74. PubMed ID: 19399665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.
    Borg E; Edquist G; Reinholdson AC; Risberg A; McAllister B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1061-77. PubMed ID: 17512613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sampling children's spontaneous speech: how much is enough?
    Tomasello M; Stahl D
    J Child Lang; 2004 Feb; 31(1):101-21. PubMed ID: 15053086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.