BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16839537)

  • 1. Self-attributed body-shadows modulate tactile attention.
    Pavani F; Galfano G
    Cognition; 2007 Jul; 104(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 16839537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch.
    Poliakoff E; Miles E; Li X; Blanchette I
    Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 16500638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From body shadows to bodily attention: automatic orienting of tactile attention driven by cast shadows.
    Pavani F; Rigo P; Galfano G
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Oct; 29():56-67. PubMed ID: 25123629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-lasting capture of tactile attention by body shadows.
    Galfano G; Pavani F
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):518-27. PubMed ID: 16028029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task.
    Miles E; Poliakoff E; Brown RJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 18262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures.
    Van Damme S; Gallace A; Spence C; Crombez G; Moseley GL
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():100-6. PubMed ID: 19094970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 16759624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Common anatomical and external coding for hands and feet in tactile attention: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Heed T; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 22(1):184-202. PubMed ID: 19199399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binding personal and extrapersonal space through body shadows.
    Pavani F; Castiello U
    Nat Neurosci; 2004 Jan; 7(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 14699414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Seeing the hand boosts feeling on the cheek.
    Serino A; Padiglioni S; Haggard P; Làdavas E
    Cortex; 2009 May; 45(5):602-9. PubMed ID: 18620343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial coordinate systems for tactile spatial attention depend on developmental vision: evidence from event-related potentials in sighted and congenitally blind adult humans.
    Röder B; Föcker J; Hötting K; Spence C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 28(3):475-83. PubMed ID: 18702719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Somatoform dissociation and somatosensory amplification are differentially associated with attention to the tactile modality following exposure to body-related stimuli.
    Brown RJ; Poliakoff E; Kirkman MA
    J Psychosom Res; 2007 Feb; 62(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 17270574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial aspects of bodily self-consciousness.
    Lenggenhager B; Mouthon M; Blanke O
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 19109039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual enhancement of touch and the bodily self.
    Longo MR; Cardozo S; Haggard P
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1181-91. PubMed ID: 18294867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The rubber hand illusion: sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership.
    Costantini M; Haggard P
    Conscious Cogn; 2007 Jun; 16(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 17317221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task effects on tactile temporal order judgments: when space does and does not matter.
    Roberts RD; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):592-604. PubMed ID: 18505326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Looking good. BMI, attractiveness bias and visual attention.
    Roefs A; Jansen A; Moresi S; Willems P; van Grootel S; van der Borgh A
    Appetite; 2008 Nov; 51(3):552-5. PubMed ID: 18495295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual processing of moving and static self body-parts.
    Frassinetti F; Pavani F; Zamagni E; Fusaroli G; Vescovi M; Benassi M; Avanzi S; Farnè A
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1988-93. PubMed ID: 19428432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Watching what's coming near increases tactile sensitivity: An experimental investigation.
    Van der Biest L; Legrain V; Paepe AD; Crombez G
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 297():307-14. PubMed ID: 26475955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.